J
J44xm
I tried Thunderbird (I still have it), but it took up 25MB of RAM as
opposed to Pegasus Mail's 12MB. What's that about?
opposed to Pegasus Mail's 12MB. What's that about?
Both Firefox and Thunderbird are supposed to be lean and mean, but I[email protected]_g said:I tried Thunderbird (I still have it), but it took up 25MB of RAM as
opposed to Pegasus Mail's 12MB. What's that about?
Both Firefox and Thunderbird are supposed to be lean and mean, but
I find them to be very slow and resource hogs compared to other
programs..
Win2k: Mozilla - 67 megs. The clear winner...Win98se: Firefox - 11.4 mb
Thunderbird - 10.2 mb
Kerodo said:Win2k: Mozilla - 67 megs. The clear winner...
WinXP - Mozilla 1.7b: 28.9mb (browser, mail & news, address book,
composer, and chatzilla)
WinXP, Mozilla 1.1 (as above) 57.2mb. Does this depend on the size of
your cache, folders etc. or has it got leaner as it has matured?
Kerodo said:Win2k: Mozilla - 67 megs. The clear winner...
And said:WinXP, Mozilla 1.1 (as above) 57.2mb. Does this depend on
the size of your cache, folders etc. or has it got leaner
as it has matured?
J44xm said:I tried Thunderbird (I still have it), but it took up 25MB of RAM as
opposed to Pegasus Mail's 12MB. What's that about?
What difference does it make if you like the program? You bought RAM to use
it, right? You aren't going to run out, swap file assures that.