Thought so

  • Thread starter Thread starter J&L
  • Start date Start date
J

J&L

Yes most likely, I didn¹t really know though.


Regards,

J&L

(e-mail address removed)
(e-mail address removed)
(e-mail address removed)
(e-mail address removed)
 
J&L said:
Yes most likely, I didn¹t really know though.


Regards,

J&L

lesley @thebarleycorn.wanadoo.co.uk
reservations @thebarleycorninn.co.uk
sales @thebarleycorninn.co.uk
pub @thebarleycorninn.co.uk
Click to expand...


From an idiot that disconnects the posts (assuming there were any of
which to connect).

From an idiot that posts using HTML.

From an idiot that really thinks putting e-mail addresses in the *body*
of their post will get them harvested by spambots.
 
From an idiot that really thinks putting e-mail addresses in the *body*
of their post will get them harvested by spambots.
Click to expand...

....and from <insert descriptive text here> who re-posted the whole damn
thing so we could read it all over again.
 
ComPCs said:
...and from <insert descriptive text here> who re-posted the whole
damn
thing so we could read it all over again.
Click to expand...


Since my post was longer than the OP's, and since the OP's post was all
of 11 lines, you must indeed have a tiny screen to read posts that
requires such a huge nuisance of scrolling. Yeah, like it would make
sense to note that putting the e-mail addresses in the body of their
post won't be seen by spambot but not illustrate that the OP did indeed
put those e-mail addresses in their post. If you are going to remark
about an item in someone's post, you should provide some proof of it.
This is Usenet. There is no guarantee that a reader will see the OP
before they see the reply.
 
Back
Top