M
MICHAEL
http://blog.wired.com/music/2006/12/warner_music_ce.html
On the last day of the recent Reuters Media and Marketing Summit in New York, Warner Music
Group CEO admitted that he was "fairly certain" that one or more of his seven children had
downloaded music without the permission of the copyright owner, which Reuters referred to as
stealing.
Despite the alleged infringers' proximity to the major label head and his direct awareness of
it without the use of ISP subpoenas, somehow no lawsuits were deemed necessary, although
Bronfman said that his kids had "suffered the consequences":
"I explained to them what I believe is right, that the principle is that stealing music is
stealing music. Frankly, right is right and wrong is wrong, particularly when a parent is
talking to a child. A bright line around moral responsibility is very important. I can assure
you they no longer do that."
So, the children of major label CEOs get a verbal explanation for infringing Warner's sacred
copyrights, while everyone else has to worry about getting sued. I totally get it. It's like
how if you're a Bush niece who has a rock of crack cocaine fall out of her shoe while in
court-ordered rehab for faking a prescription for anxiety medication, you only have to spend a
few days in jail.
On the last day of the recent Reuters Media and Marketing Summit in New York, Warner Music
Group CEO admitted that he was "fairly certain" that one or more of his seven children had
downloaded music without the permission of the copyright owner, which Reuters referred to as
stealing.
Despite the alleged infringers' proximity to the major label head and his direct awareness of
it without the use of ISP subpoenas, somehow no lawsuits were deemed necessary, although
Bronfman said that his kids had "suffered the consequences":
"I explained to them what I believe is right, that the principle is that stealing music is
stealing music. Frankly, right is right and wrong is wrong, particularly when a parent is
talking to a child. A bright line around moral responsibility is very important. I can assure
you they no longer do that."
So, the children of major label CEOs get a verbal explanation for infringing Warner's sacred
copyrights, while everyone else has to worry about getting sued. I totally get it. It's like
how if you're a Bush niece who has a rock of crack cocaine fall out of her shoe while in
court-ordered rehab for faking a prescription for anxiety medication, you only have to spend a
few days in jail.