J
Jim Butler
What are the drawbacks if any to this approach of not
using the gac for shared components... basically having a
central directory located outside of iis, that all web
applications have a virtual dir named bin pointing to this
dir. like below setup, all on each server in a farm
web site root one
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
web application a
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
web application b
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
web site root two
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
web application 2a
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
my thinking is that it would be easier/faster to deploy a
new assembly (and its config file, which entails copying
that through dos into the correct location, we read the
config file from the location of the dll) by only copying
to a directory instead of having to gac remove, gac
install, copy config file into dir
thanks, jim
using the gac for shared components... basically having a
central directory located outside of iis, that all web
applications have a virtual dir named bin pointing to this
dir. like below setup, all on each server in a farm
web site root one
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
web application a
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
web application b
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
web site root two
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
web application 2a
vdir bin points to drive\sharedbin
my thinking is that it would be easier/faster to deploy a
new assembly (and its config file, which entails copying
that through dos into the correct location, we read the
config file from the location of the dll) by only copying
to a directory instead of having to gac remove, gac
install, copy config file into dir
thanks, jim