This is a bit of a showstopper

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrTeeth
  • Start date Start date
D

DrTeeth

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;312067

So defragging will delete restore points unless the disk has 16K
clusters. The default size is 4K. Therefore problems ahead. Nice one
Bill.

Anybody know a way to non-destructively change cluster sizes on an
NTFS partition?
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
The link talks about Shadow Copies, not Restore Points.
Nice one, DrTeeth.
Click to expand...

But the Vista Restore Point functionality uses Shadow Copy, doesn't it?
Unlike XP and earlier.

SteveT
 
I've just read the article, and apparently it doesn't apply to Vista, only
to the various versions of Server 2003.

Looks like we're OK, then. Still a remarkable bug, though.

SteveT
 
But the Vista Restore Point functionality uses Shadow Copy, doesn't it?
Click to expand...

Exactly, cannot separate the two.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
DrTeeth

I wish that you guy's think what you post about Vista holds true or not.

What you have posted has NOTHING at all to do with Vista . READ THE MS KB YOU POSTED
It is a problem only with the W2K3 Server versions and only if the following holds true as per below. Also the last copy of the shadow copy is retained and the oldest deleted.


The System Shadow Copy provider uses a copy-on-write mechanism that operates at a 16-KB block level. This is independent of the file system's cluster allocation unit size. If the file system's cluster size is smaller than 16 KB, the System Shadow Copy provider cannot easily determine that disk defragmentation I/O is different from typical write I/O, and performs a copy-on-write operation. This might cause the Shadow Copy storage area to grow very quickly. If the storage area reaches its user-defined limit, the oldest shadow copies are deleted first
 
Many will, except for those that
allow for the smaller cluster size on VSS-enabled volumes - like
Diskeeper, to name one.
Click to expand...

Raxco PerfectDisk is supposed to do that, but sometimes the points get
deleted. from reading the MSKB article, no defragger is _totally_
immune.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
Steve

His (DrTeeth) post on that KB has nothing at all to do with Vista. Read the KB and what it applies to as far as which OS
 
Some people know what they are commenting about. Then there are those that
haven't got a clue!
 
Richard Urban said:
Some people know what they are commenting about. Then there are those that
haven't got a clue!

--

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP
Windows Desktop Experience
Click to expand...
Yup. Next, someone will post that they read that Vista won't
work with more than 512MB of RAM.

That myth about Win98 is still being propogated by "experts".
 
His (DrTeeth) post on that KB has nothing at all to do with Vista. Read the KB and what it applies to as far as which OS
Click to expand...

The issue IS present in Vista and has been confirmed by raxco, the
maker of PerfectDisk.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
What you have posted has NOTHING at all to do with Vista
Click to expand...

WRONG, see previous post.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
Some people know what they are commenting about. Then there are those that
haven't got a clue!
Click to expand...

Instead of being 'smart', perhaps you could be constructive. I do have
the issue in Vista SP1 and it has been confirmed by Raxco, the
publishers/authors of PerfectDisk...it is they that gave me the link.

--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
That myth about Win98 is still being propogated by "experts".
Click to expand...

We are talking about a MSKB that applies to Vista in spite of what it
says.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
DrTeeth

They are wrong as far as it affects Vista. You have a link so as we can read to confirm ??? If you do can you post it
 
Instead of being 'smart', perhaps you could be constructive. I do have
the issue in Vista SP1 and it has been confirmed by Raxco, the
publishers/authors of PerfectDisk...it is they that gave me the link.
Click to expand...

So go on, then, share the link! Otherwise we'll think you're full of shit.

SteveT
 
They are wrong as far as it affects Vista
Click to expand...

Received from PerfectDisk tech support, "Microsoft has not updated the
article but I can confirm that we deal with this quite a lot and
changing the cluster size to 16K has resolved this each time. This
applies to any Windows OS running VSS, including Vista."

Case closed.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
Sounds like rubbish to me.
Click to expand...

See post to Peter; it ain't rubbish.
--

Cheers,

DrT

** Stress - the condition brought about by having to
** resist the temptation to beat the living daylights
** out of someone who richly deserves it.
 
Back
Top