Having 1592 (the first RTM non-Beta release) installed is the exception to
the automatic removal of previous versions when 1593 is installed, in that
case a manual un-install of 1592 is required prior to installing the 1593
update. But going from Beta to 1593 directly without having 1592 should
remove the Beta automatically. I imagine that's why they didn't announce
1592 more broadly, as it only was available for a week or two back in
November.
According to Joe Faulhaber (MSFT):
"As you've noticed, there's a new English verison of Windows Defender on
the
Microsoft download site.
In addition to releasing Japanese and German versions this week, we
refreshed the English version of Windows Defender. Version 1593 includes
enhanced sample submission capability for the Japanese and German versions,
and we wanted to make this functionality available to English users as
well.
By collecting more samples from customers, we are able to create improved
definitions, which help to better protect all Windows Defender users.
If you encounter a file the Windows Defender analysts have requested a
sample of, you will get a dialog listing the files requested and you can
choose which files, if any, to submit for analysis from that dialog."
--
Regards, Dave
Beta Max wrote:> Thanks Bill. Now, can someone explain to me
why they released 1592? > Turns out this is the version we are having
trouble with and not the> beta 2 version(s). Luckily this version didn't
hit as many computers as> first thought but still annoying none the less.>
Thanks again.> > "Bill Sanderson MVP" wrote:> >> msiexec /uninstall
windowsdefender.msi /quiet /log uninstall.log>> >> (found it!)>> >> -->> >>
Please tell
me someone has one available. MS should have provided an>>> easier>>>
solution to uninstalling Beta 2 and reinstalling the official version.>>>
Going>>> to add/remove programs on hundreds of computers (don't ask) to>>>
uninstall beta>>> 2 is going to suck.