W
We Live For The One We Die For The One
I bought a 9600 Pro, should have waited a while and got a 9800 Pro.
We said:I bought a 9600 Pro, should have waited a while and got a 9800 Pro.
We Live For The One We Die For The One said:I bought a 9600 Pro, should have waited a while and got a 9800 Pro.
+CrimsonLiar said:And if you'd waited you'd probably have decided you shoulda waited for
something else instead. Look on the bright side of this, you bought a vid
card that has class leading priceerformance ratio, few 9800pro buyers
can say the same.
Upgrading depends upon what you have now. If your old card card was old, sayWe Live For The One We Die For The One said:I bought a 9600 Pro, should have waited a while and got a 9800 Pro.
I bought a 9600 Pro, should have waited a while and got a 9800 Pro.
The question you asked:
Q: "9600 Pro Vs 9800 Pro how much faster would i notice the difference ?"
The two responses that were relevant:
A: "You would notice the difference right away."
A: "As you can see... 9600Pro = 50fps vs 90fps on the 9800Pro... yeah, you'd
notice."
Your response... buying a 9600 Pro.
Two options:
1) Stick with it, it's an excellent card.
2) Check eBay for price of completed auctions of same card, subtract from
price of new 9800 Pro, save up this amount, sell the 9600 pro on eBay and go
shopping.
Wblane said:I'd say exactly the opposite. At 1024x768 I noticed NO difference between
my overclocked 9500 Pro and my 9800 Pro aside from benchmarks. MDK2 went
up from 217 FPS to 239 FPS. Quake II went from 374.5 to 468.5. Undying
changed by one whole FPS. I can now run games in 1280x1024 though. This
is on a Barton, NF7-s v2.0 2330Mhz.
Well if you're running such old games I'm not surprised.
Graphics cards aren't only there to give you FPS but a graphical experience
and you won't be using any of the new graphical techniques to render Quake
II now will you? Does it even have coloured lighting?
Ben