S
Spoon2001
A few ruminations from a mere participant.
The problem (or strength) of alt.comp.freeware has been ... there are no
real "members" of alt.comp.freeware, just participants of varying degrees of
involvement. There is no organization, no procedure for determining
authority within such organization, no persons with any authority over
anything (except the authority of the assent occasionally given by a loose
consensus).
The procedure for determining what software will be honored with the term
"Pricelessware" is plagued by many of the same underlying flaws. The
procedure has been rather ingenious, but let's face it, the number of people
participating has not been all that high. The selections in any given
category are somewhat suspect ... I bet a lot of us have "voted" for a
program when we didn't really have a clue how it stacked up against the
"competition". Who's got the time to try them all out?
Anyway ... I haven't had the time to really follow the long-running
controversy. But I say congrats to Susan for the great job on the site and
I hope she comes up with a suitable domain to host her website. I liked the
idea of "Bughertime" - reminds me of many happy hours on my old
Intellivision.
Now, with my tongue a little bit in cheek, I've been thinking that what we
need is something like the Oscars. That means there would have to be an
Academy of Freeware Arts and Sciences. What would the Freeware equivalent
of an "Oscar" be? A Freebie? Nah... got to be something better than that.
Maybe an "Irfan" in honor of Irfanview (see below). Or maybe a Flugelman,
after Andrew Flugelman, who wrote PC TALK some many years agao, and who had
such a sad ending.
This would raise some interesting possibilities.
For example, they always give out a "Lifetime Achievement" award. Somebody
who's had a great career, but hasn't done anything spectacular lately. My
nominee for the Academy's Lifetime Achievement Award for 2004 -- Irfan
Skiljan for IRFANVIEW.
Any other nominees for the Lifetime Achievement award?
The problem (or strength) of alt.comp.freeware has been ... there are no
real "members" of alt.comp.freeware, just participants of varying degrees of
involvement. There is no organization, no procedure for determining
authority within such organization, no persons with any authority over
anything (except the authority of the assent occasionally given by a loose
consensus).
The procedure for determining what software will be honored with the term
"Pricelessware" is plagued by many of the same underlying flaws. The
procedure has been rather ingenious, but let's face it, the number of people
participating has not been all that high. The selections in any given
category are somewhat suspect ... I bet a lot of us have "voted" for a
program when we didn't really have a clue how it stacked up against the
"competition". Who's got the time to try them all out?
Anyway ... I haven't had the time to really follow the long-running
controversy. But I say congrats to Susan for the great job on the site and
I hope she comes up with a suitable domain to host her website. I liked the
idea of "Bughertime" - reminds me of many happy hours on my old
Intellivision.
Now, with my tongue a little bit in cheek, I've been thinking that what we
need is something like the Oscars. That means there would have to be an
Academy of Freeware Arts and Sciences. What would the Freeware equivalent
of an "Oscar" be? A Freebie? Nah... got to be something better than that.
Maybe an "Irfan" in honor of Irfanview (see below). Or maybe a Flugelman,
after Andrew Flugelman, who wrote PC TALK some many years agao, and who had
such a sad ending.
This would raise some interesting possibilities.
For example, they always give out a "Lifetime Achievement" award. Somebody
who's had a great career, but hasn't done anything spectacular lately. My
nominee for the Academy's Lifetime Achievement Award for 2004 -- Irfan
Skiljan for IRFANVIEW.
Any other nominees for the Lifetime Achievement award?