D
domsters
no installs are the best!
domsters
domsters
no installs are the best!
domsters
Mandy said:Can you enlighten us idiots upon what you base your statement ? Some
facts would be nice.
Even though some executables do create registry entries, it's much less than mostBessy said:i don't know domsters'opinion
but my opinion in no-install tools is good, since dos times to now.
no crap in registry, no need to be installed, you can use it from an usb key
or a cd or external hd
and often these utilities are very smart and small (expecialli the
commandline versions)
you can put them in the path or not (and it's your choice; i.e. if you have
a tool that you consider "dangerous" you can execute it from a specified
directory)
and if you don't want this tool anymore, you simply delete it or his folder,
without worries about unregistering components, shared dlls or other ...
it's only my opinion![]()
ms said:Even though some executables do create registry entries, it's much less
than most normal installs.
To me, trying a simple executable is just less of a risk than running a
full install just to see if I like a program.
Mike Sa
domsters said:no installs are the best!
domsters
One could send a regular snapshot of sourceforge lists (thousands of-Art- said:domsters wrote:
Thanks Tramp!
Hope you continue the great work!
domsters said:no installs are the best!
One could send a regular snapshot of sourceforge lists (thousands of
freeware progs), very clever.
All Tramp is creating is noise, reducing the information/noise ratio.
I wish him a nice virus.
Bernd
feed a spamming troll, spend 365 days in the hole. *plizz-0nk*
Wayfarer said:One could send a regular snapshot of sourceforge lists (thousands
of freeware progs), very clever.
All Tramp is creating is noise, reducing the information/noise
ratio.
I wish him a nice virus.
Bernd
Wishing virii on folks is pretty cold. I personally don't like
the flooding, but others seem to find it useful. Consequently, a
simple PLONK rule for the more egregious flooders works just
fine. I just hope I don't miss any non-flood posts from them.
I'm probably tripping, but wouldn't it be nice if each flooder
were to agree to put in an agreed on word ([FLOOD]?) at the
beginning of each post's subject line so I don't inadvertently
filter out non-flood posts.
But at any rate, it is now most tranquil here. ;-)
Neill
Wishing virii on folks is pretty cold. I personally don't like
the flooding, but others seem to find it useful. Consequently, a
simple PLONK rule for the more egregious flooders works just
fine.
One could send a regular snapshot of sourceforge lists (thousands of
freeware progs), very clever.
All Tramp is creating is noise, reducing the information/noise ratio.
Wow...someone who doesn't like the floods demonstrating good sense.
»Q« said:There is in fact a newsgroup which is just a firehose of updates,
mostly of sourceforged stuff. fm.announce, on the server
news.freshmeat.net.
Another suggestion:
How about more talking about freeware, and less flaming... this isn't
the god darn parlement... if you wanna flame... become a politician !!!
the problem. said:Frankly, I think these so called flooders are of use and do contribute
in a positive way to the group... In the last couple of days I have
found in both PT's and Tramp's post a few very nifty programs... while
the complainers are all new to me... must be lurkersI wish they
would stay doing so!
Have a great week end all!
Dick
thats why you should killfile him/her/it for a year or so.All Tramp is creating is noise, reducing the information/noise ratio.
but not nearly as cold as wishing people DEAD. (as we do with aWishing virii on folks is pretty cold
then you can go to the killfile with them, dickie. *plizz-0nk*I think these so called flooders are of use