Test questions? (off topic)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I'm leaving my current job to go to another company so I'm helping my current boss interview candidates to replace me. I drafted a 40 question test from scratch covering Active Directory, Exchange Server, Terminal Server, SQL Server & general networking questions that I thought we could use to gauge candidate's skill levels. My problem is that the first two candidates completely bombed my test (25% or less correct), although they had MCSE, CCNA, Bachelor's Degrees in Information Technology or similar credentials + 4 or more years experience

39 of my 40 questions I made up in my head, without any reference material, so I figured it was a safe bet that experienced administrators would be able to answer a lot of my questions w/o too much difficulty. Anyone willing to look over my test to tell me if I'm being to difficult, or if the first two candidates just don't know their stuff

Here is the list of qualifications we asked for

Must have thorough knowledge of Microsoft Server Software and Services (i.e. Exchange, SQL Server, Terminal Server and Active Directory), Windows NT based Client Operating Systems, Network Security, and end user software like Microsoft Office, including Access and other database software. Must have experience performing hardware installation, configuration and repair, i.e. hard drive, RAM or CPU replacement, network cabling, router, switch, firewall, workstation and Server (with RAID Storage Systems) configuration

Test questions here
http://workthin.com/DOC/NetworkAdministratorTestWithoutAnswers.do

Thanks to anyone willing to help me out. You may email me your response via my website (support request). I'd also be willing to furnish the answers to anyone who wants them

Patrick Rous
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Serve
http://www.workthin.co
 
Patrick Rouse said:
39 of my 40 questions I made up in my head, without any reference
material, so I figured it was a safe bet that experienced administrators
would be able to answer a lot of my questions w/o too much difficulty.
Anyone willing to look over my test to tell me if I'm being to difficult, or
if the first two candidates just don't know their stuff?

I didn't look through the entire document but I would say that your
questions are way too specific. Very competant admins might not know the
answer to your questions. I think it would possible for most admins to put
together a similar doc that you would only get 25% on simply because you
have not run into those issues in you line of work. Just say there are
100,000 different facts that are along the lines of your questions and any
network admin would know the answer to 5,000 of them off the top of his
head, but everyone knows a different 5,000 Q&As, that means anyone could
write up a series of questions that others would have trouble answering.

BTW, you got question 13 wrong. :-)

Michael Culley
 
Patrick Rouse said:
I'm leaving my current job to go to another company so I'm helping my
current boss interview candidates to replace me. I drafted a 40 question
test from scratch covering Active Directory, Exchange Server, Terminal
Server, SQL Server & general networking questions that I thought we could
use to gauge candidate's skill levels. My problem is that the first two
candidates completely bombed my test (25% or less correct), although they
had MCSE, CCNA, Bachelor's Degrees in Information Technology or similar
credentials + 4 or more years experience.
39 of my 40 questions I made up in my head, without any reference
material, so I figured it was a safe bet that experienced administrators
would be able to answer a lot of my questions w/o too much difficulty.
Anyone willing to look over my test to tell me if I'm being to difficult, or
if the first two candidates just don't know their stuff?
Here is the list of qualifications we asked for:

Must have thorough knowledge of Microsoft Server Software and Services
(i.e. Exchange, SQL Server, Terminal Server and Active Directory), Windows
NT based Client Operating Systems, Network Security, and end user software
like Microsoft Office, including Access and other database software. Must
have experience performing hardware installation, configuration and repair,
i.e. hard drive, RAM or CPU replacement, network cabling, router, switch,
firewall, workstation and Server (with RAID Storage Systems) configuration.
Test questions here:
http://workthin.com/DOC/NetworkAdministratorTestWithoutAnswers.doc

Thanks to anyone willing to help me out. You may email me your response
via my website (support request). I'd also be willing to furnish the
answers to anyone who wants them.
Patrick Rouse
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
http://www.workthin.com

While managing a team of a dozen professionals, I found myself much in the
same situation as you now do. On two occasions I hired the wrong person:
Good credentials, lots of relevant experience, said all the right words
during the interview but turned out to be a liability rather than an asset.
I subsequently introduced a real-life test, and was able to attract a number
of excellent people.

While your set of questions is highly relevant to the qualifications you
specify, I think that the answers you get reveal far more about the
***current*** knowledge of the applicant than about his/her potential. In
other words, someone getting 40 out of 40 correct would be your twin
brother: He knows the job inside out. Is this really what you want? Every
new job should be a challenge, an opportunity to grow, to acquire new
skills, to pick up new technologies. Every job is scary at first, because of
one's level of ignorance, but if the ingredients are right then success will
follow. A person who answers every question correctly would either get bored
with the job within two months, or he has prepared himself with the link you
quote (which shows the name & location of your organisation).

If this was my show then I would probably split the questions into three
parts:

Part 1: Knowledge test. Pick a dozen of your most essential questions, i.e.
questions that are fundamental to the topic you're exploring.

Part 2: Test the candidate's potential. Compose a number of questions that
explore how the applicant would deal with the introduction of a new
technology. What steps would he take, what resources would he apply, has he
ever been in this situation before, what did he do?

Part 3: Test the candidate's resourcefulnes. Rather than expecting him to
know the various port numbers for specific services by heart, see if he can
find what port is used by Remote Desktop, while seated at a PC with an
Internet connection. Let him check Google for the maximum reliable run of a
CAT5 cable.

Splitting your questions like this will allow you to gauge each candidate
not only by his current detail knowledge but also by his ability to grow and
by his resourcefulnes.
 
I would also agree that questions are too specific.
First about my apeciality - I am mainly windows application and web
developer with much experience in network administration, security and
hardware.
Here is one article that I like much on this theme:
http://joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000073.html
On what operation systems can be installed whish version of Exchange...
it is easy to just look at the specification. Why not ask such specific
question, give the people access to Internet and see how fast and acurate
they can find answers and where they will look at - this is how they will
work anyway.
I think that questions from 5 - 10 are importand ones. About Q10 - they
are 5 not 6 disks.
Q11 is ambiquous - both c and d...
Q12 is dumb one. 13 is good one but port 20 is little bit confusing for
FTP - better ask for 21.
Q14,15 are confusing. 16 is strange one - probably you ask for a) but is
strange anyway.
Next ones I have just look at and seem very very specific. It is
possible that they are really needed to be known in order to sucessfully
accomplish these tasks but the fact that you remember specific cases that
probably are happened to you talks that you had hard time with them :))

Bojidar Alexandrov
 
Patrick,

Congratulations on your new job. I hope that everything will be super duper
in your new challenge ( yes, I really did write 'super duper'! ).

I looked at the document and went through it fairly quickly. I somewhat
agree with the other posters. Probably 17 to 20 of the questions should be
common knowledge for someone who has done this job for a couple of years.
So, I would anticipate that someone should - at worst - be getting in the
50% range.

I really agree with Pegasus. I like the idea of letting people find the
answer ( via Google, the appropriate Knowledge Base or News Group,
whatever ) as we all know very well that you can not know everything that
there is to know in this field. As long as someone has a core competency
( aka a very solid foundation ) then there should not be any problem filling
in the blanks. On top of that I firmly believe that everyone has his / her
own way of doing things, that everyone has his / her own style. There will
never be another Patrick where you currently work. If it takes someone
three hours to find the maximum reliable length that you can use for Cat 5
then maybe this person is not the right person!

I would have trouble with the SQL / Access questions that were on your test
but not with much else ( probably because I have never touched SQL ). I do
not know if I agree with the 'way to specific' comments. I think that the
vast majority of your questions are indeed real life situations. I think
that the important thing would be not to simply see if they can add two and
two and come up with four but to see how they came to four ( or whatever
their answer might be ). I remember back in high school Calculus that our
teacher did not really care about the answer ( well, Dr. Woodsmall did care
about that! ). He was much more interested in how you arrived at the
answer. If you did a simple 'addition' error incorrectly somewhere along
the line and that threw off everything from that point forward you did not
get the answer marked wrong, you simply lost a couple of points for 'dumb
addition'. Try to see where their 'dumb addition' errors and then determine
if those errors can be corrected or if they just can't add!

Anyway, good luck to you in your future endeavors.

Cary

PS - It is A L W A Y S those dang printer drivers ;-)

Patrick Rouse said:
I'm leaving my current job to go to another company so I'm helping my
current boss interview candidates to replace me. I drafted a 40 question
test from scratch covering Active Directory, Exchange Server, Terminal
Server, SQL Server & general networking questions that I thought we could
use to gauge candidate's skill levels. My problem is that the first two
candidates completely bombed my test (25% or less correct), although they
had MCSE, CCNA, Bachelor's Degrees in Information Technology or similar
credentials + 4 or more years experience.
39 of my 40 questions I made up in my head, without any reference
material, so I figured it was a safe bet that experienced administrators
would be able to answer a lot of my questions w/o too much difficulty.
Anyone willing to look over my test to tell me if I'm being to difficult, or
if the first two candidates just don't know their stuff?
Here is the list of qualifications we asked for:

Must have thorough knowledge of Microsoft Server Software and Services
(i.e. Exchange, SQL Server, Terminal Server and Active Directory), Windows
NT based Client Operating Systems, Network Security, and end user software
like Microsoft Office, including Access and other database software. Must
have experience performing hardware installation, configuration and repair,
i.e. hard drive, RAM or CPU replacement, network cabling, router, switch,
firewall, workstation and Server (with RAID Storage Systems) configuration.
Test questions here:
http://workthin.com/DOC/NetworkAdministratorTestWithoutAnswers.doc

Thanks to anyone willing to help me out. You may email me your response
via my website (support request). I'd also be willing to furnish the
answers to anyone who wants them.
 
Honestly if someone asked me questions like this I would probably walk out of
the interview if I didn't feel like shredding the person asking the questions
instead. Most of this stuff is stuff you look up when you need it or is just
plain silly to ask. It would be a sign to me of someone who I am not sure I
would want to work for/with as the emphasis is on the wrong thing.

You should not focus on what someone knows, but what they are capable of
figuring out or doing. The answers to your questions can be memorized and
someone could know them right there which means they might be right for the job
right now, what about a year from now when something new and different hits. On
the flip side, I don't want someone working for/with me that has simply proven
they can memorize stuff, I want them to be able to figure things out or know how
to find answers.

Questions along that line are much harder to come up with and for a lot of them
there are no single right answers. I would ask things along the line of "How
would you tackle a problem like this or that?". Where would you go look for
answers. Do you use network sniffer software? If so, what software? What are
some issues you figured out? What annoys you about exchange? What annoys you
about AD? How do you feel about patch management? Etc. The responses should
give you a feel of the actual knowledge and capability versus what is memorized
from a book or newsgroups. Basically communicate with the people and get a feel
for them. A knowledgeable admin will pick out other knowledgable admins.

I agree that a lot (most) of these questions are too specific. Many admins I
know that have been forced into a position of interviewing people get into a
pissing battle with the applicant to try and show who knows more. That shouldn't
be the goal however if one of my junior admins brought me this list of questions
that is what I would determine it to be. You should be looking for someone with
the capability to handle the position that exists now and what unknown thing it
can evolve into.

On top of that, you would probably get some arguments over what you think the
answers are to your questions though I am sure you feel your answers are all
correct (and could be in your environment) so any argument would be considered
as wrong in your scoring. There were several questions in there that I am sure
our answers wouldn't align. The situations being described should have been
prevented in the first place (IMO) or they are only applicable in small
environments where my experience is with Global Enterprise Systems comprising
tens of thousands of users or hundreds of thousands of users.

If I actually sat through that interview and you let me finish, my questions
back to you would have been about security because from the direction of the
questions I would be very leary of the environment and how secure it was.

Giving specific questions with specific answers like that doesn't work in only
letting good people become MCSE's, why would you think you can come up with
specific questions with specific answers to do so?

The last few people I have worked with would never have gotten the jobs they got
with me had they had to answer a question list I made up like this concerning
our environment. I doubt there is anyone that could have gotten the job, maybe
even me. However the guys in those slots are really good and I am glad they are
there.


joe
 
Must have thorough knowledge of Microsoft Server Software and Services (i.e. Exchange, SQL Server, Terminal Server and Active Directory), Windows NT based Client Operating Systems, Network Security, and end user software like Microsoft Office, including Access and other database software. Must have experience performing hardware installation, configuration and repair, i.e. hard drive, RAM or CPU replacement, network cabling, router, switch, firewall, workstation and Server (with RAID Storage Systems) configuration.
Test questions here:
http://workthin.com/DOC/NetworkAdministratorTestWithoutAnswers.doc

Thanks to anyone willing to help me out. You may email me your response via my website (support request). I'd also be willing to furnish the answers to anyone who wants them.

To start, many of the questions are reciting facts you could always
look up if you ever needed them. I hate those kinds of employment
tests, because it indicates the employer really doesn't know what they
need done. Does your job *really* require knowing how many channels
are in T1? Or the maximum length of an ethernet run?

Beyond that, some of the questions actually can't be easily answered
with your answers. They depend on the environment as much as the
straight Microsoft book-learning issues. Such as your question 25:

"Users can not print to any network printer. The network printers are
setup as TCPIP printers on a Windows Server. Other network functions
on the server are working normally. What is the first thing you
should do to resolve the situation:"

The answer may very well be "Plug the switch all the network printers
are attached to back in and unplug the coffepot like you meant to."

Your SQL questions cover administration and programming, which may be
separate functions in a user's past shop. Your Exchange questions
cover installation parameters (What OS will xxx run on, what needs to
be installed for it to function, etc.) Unless you expect the new guy
to install Exchange fifteen minutes after he starts work without
access to the manuals or an internet connection, these are questions
nobody *needs* to know the answers to. You ask a licensing question
about Microsoft Office and it can't really be correctly answered,
because it depends on the licensing program you're running under as
well as policies of the organization beyond licensing. For example,
we over-license several products, including Office, since it's
adjusted annually and our work environment may change daily.

And the killer that would make me walk is any OSI model question.
When I see questions about the OSI model, I know the employer has no
clue about the job they're hiring for. Except for network analysts
and engineers I have yet to find anyone who uses the OSI model in
real-world scenarios.

You're looking for someone with a lot of depth across a broad array of
technologies, and it's going to be *very* hard to find someone if a
test like this is used as an exclusion. But, there's really only one
type of applicant you want to hire after giving this test anyway.
That's the one who comes back and says "I've written answers for most
of these, but let's discuss what you'd do and why you do it that way
so I can get a feel for what you're looking for in me performing your
job functions."

Jeff
 
That would be my first reaction, also. My skills are not in memorizing
arcane facts and taking tests. They are in analyzing and resolving problems
and learning new skills. When I started 2 1/2 years ago (after 28 years at
IBM), I knew nothing about AD, Exchange, VoIP, or Citrix MetaFrame. Now,
people actually think I'm an "expert" (hey who am I to tell them
otherwise??). If I need facts, I can look them up. Knowing what OS can
support Exchange 2003 or how many channels are in a T1 line are worthless to
a customer who can't print from Outlook to a Citrix connected printer.

Frankly, I'd be real concerned about hiring anyone with all the requisite
skills & experience that those job requirements and test indicate they need.
It's going to be hard to retain someone who can walk out the door and
increase/double their salary without missing a paycheck.

I support a Hospice in upstate New York and we've hired two people over the
past 18 months. In both cases, it was more important that the person be
someone who had a good background & experience, but just as important was
whether they were a team player, a person who could learn and someone who
was willing to listen. We ran into at least one candidate in our last round
of interviews who seemed to have the level of experience that the original
poster required. Neither one of us put him on the short list. Qualified? You
bet your ass. Team player? not a chance. We knew he was history as soon as
the job market improved.
 
Patrick Rouse said:
Must have thorough knowledge of Microsoft Server Software and Services
(i.e. Exchange, SQL Server, Terminal Server and Active Directory), Windows
NT based Client Operating Systems, Network Security, and end user software
like Microsoft Office, including Access and other database software. Must
have experience performing hardware installation, configuration and
repair, i.e. hard drive, RAM or CPU replacement, network cabling, router,
switch, firewall, workstation and Server (with RAID Storage Systems)
configuration.

I suspect you are simply expecting too much. When you started your present
job, what do you think your rating would have been on the test? Chances are,
you have learned quite a lot of these things on the present job through
trial, error, and looking things up on Google.

My suggestion would be to dump all but the 2nd last page of the test. Let
people tell you what they're
good at, and then ask questions tailored to what they say they are good at.
Face to face, so you can judge how they think about it - because afterall,
we use Google/whatever most of the time.

My suspicion is that what your company needs is someone who is capable of
learning more than they need someone who can memorise facts. Find someone
who has good experience in the areas *most* important to your company and
who can also learn the rest as and when it's required.

Regards,

John
 
It seems the general consensus here is that the test is far too specific and
too long. I agree that the question set is pretty specific in places but
some of the questions are need-to-know stuff. I see about half the questions
as either who cares or who cares, I can look it up in 2 min or less and have
a full KB article describing the steps to completion. That said here's a
breakdown of the questions as I see them [if you care, which I guess you
should since you asked :-)

1. Should know this
2. Look it up
3. See 2
4. Who cares, look it up when necessary
5 & 6. See 4.
7. Fair, but should be referenced before install as part of planning
8. Who cares
9. See 8.
10, 11 & 12. Yank these.
13. Fair question and one a net admin should know
14 & 15. See 4.
16. Answer = Windows.
17 Fair question
18. That's the Net Manager's job to know that
19. Fair permissions question. A candidate should get this one.
20 & 21. Yank these
22. Fair enough
23 & 24. Yank
25. Fair question
26. See 25.
27. Pleeease
28 & 29. Yank
30. Yank
31. Good question, too specific
32, 33, 34, 35 & 36. Keep 33 yank the rest
37 & 38. Who cares
39. Look it up
40. Answer = Fire him for being an 1d10t

You've got a right to test a candidate's knowledge but reading through this
list gave me flashbacks to writing all those annoying certification exams.
More emphasis on team, research and think-on-your-feet-creative skills and
less on the heavy tech.

HTH
Reg
Patrick Rouse said:
I'm leaving my current job to go to another company so I'm helping my
current boss interview candidates to replace me. I drafted a 40 question
test from scratch covering Active Directory, Exchange Server, Terminal
Server, SQL Server & general networking questions that I thought we could
use to gauge candidate's skill levels. My problem is that the first two
candidates completely bombed my test (25% or less correct), although they
had MCSE, CCNA, Bachelor's Degrees in Information Technology or similar
credentials + 4 or more years experience.
39 of my 40 questions I made up in my head, without any reference
material, so I figured it was a safe bet that experienced administrators
would be able to answer a lot of my questions w/o too much difficulty.
Anyone willing to look over my test to tell me if I'm being to difficult, or
if the first two candidates just don't know their stuff?
Here is the list of qualifications we asked for:

Must have thorough knowledge of Microsoft Server Software and Services
(i.e. Exchange, SQL Server, Terminal Server and Active Directory), Windows
NT based Client Operating Systems, Network Security, and end user software
like Microsoft Office, including Access and other database software. Must
have experience performing hardware installation, configuration and repair,
i.e. hard drive, RAM or CPU replacement, network cabling, router, switch,
firewall, workstation and Server (with RAID Storage Systems) configuration.
Test questions here:
http://workthin.com/DOC/NetworkAdministratorTestWithoutAnswers.doc

Thanks to anyone willing to help me out. You may email me your response
via my website (support request). I'd also be willing to furnish the
answers to anyone who wants them.
 
Hank Arnold said:
poster required. Neither one of us put him on the short list. Qualified? You
bet your ass. Team player? not a chance. We knew he was history as soon as
the job market improved.

I've been in this situation before, one candidate was clearly better than
the other but it was obvious he would be moving on to somewhere better at
the first opportunity. The problem is you can't exactly say this to
management. :-)

Michael Culley
 
Just for giggles, here's my run-through of it. You'll have to compare this
to the document in the link. There is no way I was going to type out all
those questions.

1. 16 Gig
2. Win2000 Server
3. Win2003 Server
4. Jet
5. Perform Full backup
6. True answer no there. It would be a combination deleting unneeded mail
and a compaction of the database (maybe that is what you meant by "defrag?)
7. DNS, Active Directory
8. I suspect 4, but never really worried about it. That's the line
provider's job to worry about that.
9. 1.54Mb
10. 91Gb
11. Raid0 has not fault tolerance, so that isn't it
Raid5 is slowed by the parity, so that isn't it
Raid10, never heard of if. Not sure there eve is such a thing
Raid1, This is definitely the right one, but only is it is also "duplexed"
(duel scsi cards) so that the machine can write to both drives
simultaneously more efficiently. If it is standard Raid1 without duplexing
(single scsi card) then it is not as efficient.
12. I know about half by memory
13. DNS 53
FTP 20, 21, Dynamic Range for "client ports" (1024-5000)
HTTP 80
HTTPS 443
ICA ???
POP 110
RDP ???
RPC ???
SQL 1433
SMTP 25
Telnet 23
14. Don't know, I don't use TS
15. Don't know, I don't use TS
16. It is usually a hardware problem on any Windows machines, not just TS
17. Don't know, I don't use TS
18. You could probably get by with 25
19. Remove Bill from the Tech Group
20. (c.) Distribute Access Runtime Edition
21. I don't run SQL Server, but I can take a stab at this...(a.) Stored
Procedure, (b.) Trigger, (c.)Index, (d.) Cursor, (e.) Query, (f.) Join, (g.)
Union
22. The DNS "MX" record needs corrected. Also, with some firewalls it may be
required to recreate your server-publishing rule if changing the external
address happens to break the old one.
23. Don't know
24. (a.) They are considered Layer3 devices, but they operate at 2 (ARP and
Proxy ARP Requests), 3 (Obvious), 4 (ExtendedACLs) (b.) Layer1 (c.) Layer2
(d.) Layer7 (Application) (e.) Layer6 (Presentation) (f.) Layer4 and some in
Layer5 (g.) multiple layers, depends on what "communication" you are asking
about
25. I commented on this one in the newsgroup. It is a poor question
26. Use a Cross-over cable
27. 100 meters
28. Grab the programmer and slap him around a bit and make him write the App
more efficiently
29. Same as #28
30. It isn't running in full-duplex mode
31. You only restored only one server. You also forgot to get MS Support on
the phone and have them at least "stay with you" through the process so you
don't screw up such a potentially dangerous situation, ......since this
isn't something most Admins deal with everyday. Also don't forget the
required "public Boss beatings" to be held on Monday morning.
32. Convert c:
33. Backup "System State"
34. Don't know
35. MS's method is too complex and "clunky". Use Ghost "AI Packages"
36. Don't know the whole path by memory, but it would end up in the "Run" or
"Services" key.
37. Don't know. Don't have much interest in that area. I am of the opinion
that many of these types of hardware "features" don't make much performance
difference for an office environment in the "grand scheme of things".
38. multi-processor application
39. See #14, #15, #17
40. He is running XP Home instead of XP Pro.

Self Assessment
I'm not going to type all that section out. About 20% -25% of them I have
never used or have limited experience. The rest would be almost all
"Confortable with" because I'm smart enough to know, that the more you know,
the more you realize how much you don't know. So I always strive to avoid
over-confidence, there is too many IT people out there that don't realize
how much information is out there that they really don't know.


--

Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com


(i.e. Exchange, SQL Server, Terminal Server and Active Directory), Windows
NT based Client Operating Systems, Network Security, and end user software
like Microsoft Office, including Access and other database software. Must
have experience performing hardware installation, configuration and repair,
i.e. hard drive, RAM or CPU replacement, network cabling, router, switch,
firewall, workstation and Server (with RAID Storage Systems) configuration.via my website (support request). I'd also be willing to furnish the
answers to anyone who wants them.
 
Jeff Cochran said:
"Users can not print to any network printer. The network printers are
setup as TCPIP printers on a Windows Server. Other network functions
on the server are working normally. What is the first thing you
should do to resolve the situation:"

The answer may very well be "Plug the switch all the network printers
are attached to back in and unplug the coffepot like you meant to."

It is also misleading. TCP/IP Printers don't use Servers (not counting the
obvious card in the Printer). While Shared Printers (shared from a server)
aren't considered TCP/IP Printers since they are only TCP/IP Printers from
the sharing Server's perspective. Yet this question says "TCPIP printers on
a Windows Server" which leaves the person not knowing what is really meant
by the thing.
And the killer that would make me walk is any OSI model question.
When I see questions about the OSI model, I know the employer has no
clue about the job they're hiring for. Except for network analysts
and engineers I have yet to find anyone who uses the OSI model in
real-world scenarios.

Not sure I'd agree here unless the questions focus on the upper layers. But
a ton of questions people write into these group for their problems wouldn't
even be a problem to begin with it they had a good understanding of the
relationship of the lower four Layers
test like this is used as an exclusion. But, there's really only one
type of applicant you want to hire after giving this test anyway.
That's the one who comes back and says "I've written answers for most
of these, but let's discuss what you'd do and why you do it that way
so I can get a feel for what you're looking for in me performing your
job functions."

My thoughts exactly. I would ask the interviewer if the guy who wrote the
test worked there. If he did, I would hand the test back and tell them that
if the guy who wrote the test would be willing to do it as an "oral exam"
where I would have the opportunity to question him about the "context" of
the questions, and them give "oral" answers that can cover variances in
situations, then that would be fine. Otherwise there isn't any point in
taking a test because it would not accuartely reflect my abilities.
 
7. DNS, Active Directory

And WINS (or some form of NetBIOS resolution) in some environments. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=837391. Note this would mostly be
larger environments or multisite environments with disjoint name space. Exactly
the environments you can't use broadcast and don't want to use lmhosts in and
DNS won't do it unless you have a hellacious suffix search order list.
Raid10, never heard of if. Not sure there eve is such a thing

Raid 10 is 1+0 which is a stripe set of mirrors. It is the fastest from a pure
IO perspective if there are enough mirrors in the stripe set, I think 3+ mirrors.
19. Remove Bill from the Tech Group

Exactly what I thought. But I think there was an initial beat him with a bat in
there as well.

28. Grab the programmer and slap him around a bit and make him write the App
more efficiently

Ditto but add bat.


There were others worth comment but those are the ones that mostly stuck out.
 
7. DNS, Active Directory

And WINS (or some form of NetBIOS resolution) in some environments. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=837391. Note this would mostly be
larger environments or multisite environments with disjoint name space. Exactly
the environments you can't use broadcast and don't want to use lmhosts in and
DNS won't do it unless you have a hellacious suffix search order list.
Raid10, never heard of if. Not sure there eve is such a thing

Raid 10 is 1+0 which is a stripe set of mirrors. It is the fastest from a pure
IO perspective if there are enough mirrors in the stripe set, I think 3+ mirrors.
19. Remove Bill from the Tech Group

Exactly what I thought. But I think there was an initial beat him with a bat in
there as well.

28. Grab the programmer and slap him around a bit and make him write the App
more efficiently

Ditto but add bat.


There were others worth comment but those are the ones that mostly stuck out.
 
in message

I have a lot of issues with this document. I'm not holding any punches. If
you want someone to humor or BS you, don't read any further. I am
responding to give you a little dose of reality re: my opinion of your
questionaire. It is my understanding you're looking for an honest answer,
without sugar-coating and that is what I am giving you. It's also not
written to be politically correct because political correctness has nothing
to do with the truth or reality. Some of this may be hard to read but if I
am anything but totally honest, I'm just yanking your chain. And, if you're
asking just so someone will agree with you, then you're wasting our time by
asking.

I take my career seriously and I have no patience for incompetence or
ignorance due to lack of knowledge, which is due to lack of research, which
is due to lack of ambition. Any of these is ok so long the former is not a
product of the latter.

If you want to know if someone is competent, discuss a current issue with
them and let them tell you what their approach would be. Don't give them a
ridiculous test asking, "Do you know how to do this?" Your questions cross
into other areas beyond that of a LAN Admin. LAN Admins don't develop,
perform DBA or design networks. Those functions are performed by
developers, DBAs and System Engineers/Architects, respectively. People
working jobs, that cross these boundaries, work for a company that is not
paying them adequately, manipulating them, and/or is too small with too
small a budget to do so and probably has the mind set of, "it's a computer,
how difficult can it be?"

Don't expect them to have the answer if you don't have it yourself and it is
not specific to your network and pertinent to performing their duties. My
recommendation is that you end this charade and let a placement service weed
out unqualified candidates and concentrate on your new job and let your
ex-boss concentrate on destroying the AD infrastructure.

: I'm leaving my current job to go to another company so I'm helping my
current boss interview candidates to replace me.

So, you and your boss are performing HR duties that you are not qualified
for? If this is a public company, your investors are bailing since this
violates the security model and shows disorganization and a bad use of
resources.

: I drafted a 40 question test from scratch covering Active Directory,
Exchange Server, Terminal Server, SQL Server & general networking questions
that I thought we could use to gauge candidate's skill levels.

Why? You only get one chance to make a first impression. You're telling
all your candidates, "We don't believe anything you say and your resume is
most likely fake. You MUST take our version of the lie detector test.
We'll trust you and actually take the time to fully read your resume, if you
pass, since we didn't read past your name and phone number to call you in to
take it."

: My problem is that the first two candidates completely bombed my test (25%
or less correct),

I can't imagine why... but if I had to guess it would be because most of it
has nothing to do with LAN administration.

: although they had MCSE,

....which means nothing since most of your test questions require experience
which you do not get by taking MSFT exams. MSFT training gives you exposure
in a controlled environment. This has NOTHING to do with reality or a
production environment. ABSOLUTELY ZERO!!

: CCNA,

Where were the Cisco questions? You might as well add CCIE, CISSP, GSEC,
GCIH, MSCD, ASE, ACE, etc. because those also do not apply to most of the
questions asked.

: Bachelor's Degrees in Information Technology

Their IT degree is designed to get them in the door and give them a chance
to move into management. It is not designed to make them competent network
admins. There is nothing more valuable than relative work experience. It
doesn't matter how many acronyms are behind their name if they can't perform
their duties.

: or similar credentials

like?

: + 4 or more years experience.

in what? network administration? IT history? Development? DBA? Network
design? All networks are different, etc. Wouldn't it be more relative if
they had experience in the equipment you use?

: 39 of my 40 questions I made up in my head,

It shows. *no offense* You asked very vertical questions pertaining ONLY
to your network and some technology-related history questions which have
nothing to do with the performance of their job. You also covered things
that should not be introduced since this is NOT a new network and if found,
it means you didn't know what you were doing while you were there. These
types of questions should be applied to someone working for a VAR in an SE
role or someone getting ready to take an exam and not a LAN Admin.

: without any reference material,

Why would you do that? Is that statement made to impress us with your
knowledge of a network you've worked on for some time because it says to me
that you didn't take the time to research, nor are you qualified, to write
technical documentation or quizzes/tests. It also tells me you lack
preparation skills which probably explains why a lot of these questions have
nothing to do with LAN Administration. You're hiring a person, not a robot.
Asking the person questions about themselves is more relative than most of
the questions you listed. You should be trying to find out if they are a
good fit for the company which encompasses more than if they're good at
taking little quizzes without given preparation time. Have you ever been
given a test without knowing the subject matter and without having time to
study? Why would you subject any potential employee that you want to be
part of your team to that? What does that say to them about what to expect
from this company? A LAN Admin researches to find the answer. Nobody will
have every possible answer to every possible scenario. If they do, you
can't afford them and they definitely wouldn't be looking for a LAN Admin
position.

: so I figured it was a safe bet that experienced administrators would be
able to answer a lot of my questions w/o too much difficulty.

Wrong. You covered areas that do NOT generally apply to network admins,
i.e. SQL Administration. Where is the DBA? Also, unless you use metric
calculations, why would you ask for the cable distance in meters? Knowing
what the distance is does not imply they know how to measure it. How would
YOU measure it and if you walked it, would you measure in metric?

I would have to concur that for troubleshooting, knowing that anything over
100 meters is not reliable but it does not imply, by default, that it IS the
issue. After all, is the admin now running cable? How many hats is that
and if he has to cover so many areas, is this a 6 figure income? Surely a
small shop cannot afford that level of an engineer and if the company could,
then the network would most likely be a lot bigger and would employ a DBA,
and possibly different levels of engineers and you also wouldn't be limited
to one admin.

: Anyone willing to look over my test to tell me if I'm being to difficult,
or if the first two candidates just don't know their stuff?

Not difficult, ridiculous. This doesn't tell me anything other than they
have some exposure and possibly have knowledge in areas not pertaining to
their job description. You need to get HR involved so they can help you and
you need to research on how to interview potential employees or better yet,
outsource it. I read something in a book back in 1991. It said, "By the
time people are 21 years of age, they are pretty much who they are always
going to be. You can teach them a skill or a trade but you cannot teach
them to be a nice person." Where are the questions you ask about what kind
of person they are? None of your questions have anything to do with team
participation. You should put them at ease and ask them things about
themselves. Most people are more open and comfortable talking about things
they know well. If this person is an *ss, then certifications and knowledge
don't make a difference. If you do not think you can work with this person,
then it doesn't matter what they know or don't know. Your interview should
NOT have the have the theme, "Try to stump the applicant."

A network admin needs to be liked to be succesful at his/her job. They also
need to be respected. Some questions I have been asked in interviews were:
(my answers interspersed)

1. Why do you want to work here?

I have not made that decision yet. This interview is much of one for you as
it is for me. I am here to evaluate your company as well as be evauated.
Hopefully we can get closer today to seeing if we're a good fit for each
other.

2. What do you tell the user when they ask what you did to fix it?

I fixed it. I try not to answer specifically but more in general. I
educate the user on what to look for and what they can do to solve some
issues without calling for help and when to call the IT department. If I
just answer a question which may be outside of their area of understanding,
has the user benefitted? Was my goal to impress or confuse them at that
point? What has been useful is to tell them if they ever want to stop by
after their day or want to discuss things at lunch, I'd be happy to share
some things information on what we do in the IT department.

3. What do you do when you're walking down the hallway to visit with a user
who is having a problem and a manager of a department stops you and asks you
to come look at a problem they're having? another user does the same thing?

I explain to them I have an appointment with someone else and inform them
they must enter a call with the helpdesk so we can stay organized. If they
are down and cannot perform their duties then they will be given top
priority. I inform them I will check with them after reviewing the call
they placed with the helpdesk and then politely excuse myself.

4. You're working on the CEO/CFO's laptop when you discover porn on the driv
e. What do you do?

I follow the company policies and procedures manual which should instruct me
to first notify my immediate supervisor and possibly let them handle the
situation or instruct me further. This will most likely include getting HR
involved. You never know when you're being tested and not following
procedures is not a remedy for dealing with someone not following
procedures. If the CEO and other upper management personnel are immune from
policies and procedures, then this is not a place where I want to be
employed.

5. What do you use to stay organized?

I use a day timer, PDA and help desk software. A network should be fully
documented and there is no reason to reinvent the wheel. Over time you may
not remember immediately what course of action you took to remedy a
situation but being able to research your notes, over time, can help to
reduce or eliminate duplicating research efforts.

6. What is my name? (asked 30 minutes into the first interview)

(The first thing I do, when meeting with them, is take out my notebook (not
computer) and enter their name at the top and I also take notes throughout
the interview. I will always know their name or have a way to quickly
review it. Also, it helps if you use their name when conversing with them.)

7. How do you feel about overtime, BTW, you're exempt! weekends? travel?

I am willing to work within reasonable boundaries regarding overtime,
weekends, travel as much as anyone else in my team is expected to.

8. Do you prefer to work alone or in a team?

I am capable of working completely alone but have found I and the company
benefit more when issues are approached and remedied in cooperation with
other team members.

9. What can you bring to the company/team?

I bring years of experience in my areas of expertise and work in conjunction
with my team members to help promote stability and organzation within our
department.

10. Do you have any questions of us?

Can you provide projections of company growth and direction over the next 5
and 10 years?
Do you foresee the company being merged with or bought out within the next
5/10 years?
How long have the other team members been employed and what are their areas
of expertise?
What are the company policies towards security?
What is the procedure for dealing with negative users?
Does the IT department have someone at a peer level with upper management?
I will have additional questions, which are not pertinent now, during the
different stages of the interview process. If and when receive a formal
offer, in writing, I will have additional questions.

: Here is the list of qualifications we asked for:
:
: Must have thorough knowledge of Microsoft Server Software and Services
(i.e. Exchange, SQL Server, Terminal Server and Active Directory), Windows
NT based Client Operating Systems, Network Security, and end user software
like Microsoft Office, including Access and other database software. Must
have experience performing hardware installation, configuration and repair,
i.e. hard drive, RAM or CPU replacement, network cabling, router, switch,
firewall, workstation and Server (with RAID Storage Systems) configuration.

This is very vague.

First of all, define THOROUGH! Be specific. How ironic that you're
questions were so specific yet the required qualifications are general?!

Microsoft Server Software: Which versons(s)? Any application servers
besides SQL & Exchange?
Exchange: Which version(s)? Are you using more than one? If so, WHY?
MS SQL: Which version(s)?
Terminal Server: Which version(s)?
Window NT-based client OS: Which ones?
Network Security: Firewall? IDS? Group Policies? MD5? IPSec? Penetration
Testing? Forensics? Packet Sniffing? Antivirus? Content Filtering?
like Microsoft Office?: Like what? Corel? Well, MS Office or not? Which
version(s)?
other database software: ? Which one(s)?
hardware installation: Which hardware? Servers? Desktops? PDAs?
Notebooks? Racks? Interconnectivity? Telecommunications? Patch Panels?
Printers? Fax Machines? Copiers/Printers/Scanners? Access Points? DSU/CSUs?
Modems? Monitors? Network printer sharing devices? CD Jukeboxes?
hardware repair?: Depot level repair or do you mean replacement? A LAN
Admin doesn't repair hardware. They troubleshoot it and swap it out, if
necessary.
hard drive, RAM, CPU?: Is this a clone shop? Aren't these systems under
warranty? How long do you keep equipment. Surely you understand the cost
of equipment is not only the line item cost during the purchasing process?!
Cabling: CAT5 only or something else? Not doing any voice?
Router: Which one(s)? Brand/model?
Switch[es]: Which one(s)? Brand/model? VLANs involved?
Firewall: Which one(s)? Brand/model? VPN?
Workstation: Which one(s)? Brand/model?
Server: Which one(s)? Brand/model? Rack mounted?
RAID?: Which level(s)? Hardware/software? Brand/model array controllers?

Looks ridiculous for an employment ad right? Not really. You can list that
you're looking for a seasoned network administrator with MSFT technologies,
Compaq/HP/Cisco hardware, duties including client/server/limited DBA and
then offer specifics.

Being knowledgable with a 3COM Switch and wanting Cisco switch knowledge
means you have no knowledge. The general understanding is the same but this
means they will have to get up to speed with that specific brand/model and
known issues. A Nortel Router and a Cisco router are night and day. Mix in
Cabletron and you add outer space to the equation. If you're going to be
general, you're going to get people with general knowlege or at the very
least, you're going to waste time interviewing unqualified candidates.
Also, unless you work directly with placement services, NOT HEAD HUNTERS,
you're probably not going to find the level of person you're looking for.
They should be qualifying candidates for you. This is not your area of
expertise. And, unless you're offering a very good compensation package,
this is ALL overkill since LAN Admins are not seen as high on the totem pole
in the IT arena.

: Test questions here:
: http://workthin.com/DOC/NetworkAdministratorTestWithoutAnswers.doc

Re: your questions:

You shouldn't be listing a MSFT Word document as a download on the Internet.
It begs the question, "How secure is your network and where is the quality
control?" Reserve that for your Intranet. Don't assume everyone trusts
you.

1. What's the difference? A better question would have been what is the
limit of a PST/OST file and what happens when you reach that limit?
However, this level of knowledge doesn't prove anything other than perhaps
they have come across it in the past. Are you running XCH 5.5, 2000, 2003?
If you're not running all 3, why ask? It sounds more like a bragging
contest.

2. Shouldn't this already be installed? If so, surely you're not moving
backwards with technology. Perhaps a better question would be if you
upgrade your servers to Windows 2K3, do you have to upgrade MS Exchange 2K
and/or MS SQL 2K? However, this can be found easily, so perhaps you could
add, "... if you are not sure, how would you find out?" If the primary
function of the LAN Admin is NOT research, I wouldn't hire them. You might
as well also ask them how to overhaul a transmission because it is as
relative to an existing network as this question is.

3. Are you running all of these NOS? If not, then why ask? Isn't this
already installed or planned?

4. How is this relevant to them being able to perform their duties?

5. If you're referring to transaction log files, then say that since that is
what they're called. Truncating meaning reducing them to 0 bytes or
truncating them to a specific size or deleting them? This is probably a
valid question to find out of they have some Exchange knowledge but if they
took Exchange, as an elective, for their MCSE, they should be able to easily
answer this question but it does not imply they really are capable of
administering Exchange XX version.

6. See #5 beginning at: "This is probably a valid question..."

7. Don't these already exists? Again, this is not a new network. Perhaps
one of the most frequently asked AD/DNS questions could replace this
question: "Which DNS servers do you use on an AD network?"

a. ISP
b. Local
c. Root Hints
d. Mix: a & b
e. Mix: a, b & c
f. Any so long as you're using DNS.
g. none of the above. DNS is not required
h. Use HOSTS instead of DNS
i. WINS is preferred over DNS

8. 24, but, unless you're a local loop or long haul provider, who cares?
Voice or data? Isn't your phone switch using PRIs? How many channels are
available for voice vs data? What is the size of the channel? Again, it's
not relative to the performance of their job.

9. d. None of the above since it's 1.544mbps (megabits per second - MB =
megabytes.)

10. It's generally referred to as a RAID5 configuration. Obviously you're
going for 91 but no need to do the math. They only need to know drives
should be the same size, speed and type, minimum 3, although size can vary
but would truncate to LCD. Perhaps you could ask what are the two single
points of failure in a RAID5 configuration? I see more relevant questions
being in the area of troubleshooting rather than basic technology
requirements/limitations.

11. Hopefully nobody is using RAID0 and you should be aware that RAID10 is
RAID1 & 0 and not array duplexing if that is what d. refers to which should
be rather RAID51 (Two RAID5 arrays, duplexed so the controller and cable are
not single points of failure). Are you running RAID1 and RAID5? Do you
have any application that would benefit significantly with RAID1 over RAID5
and critical to having that performance increase for writes which will be
decreased on reads compared to RAID5? You should be aware there are
generally more reads than writes on any drive.
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/perf/raid/levels/multLevel01-c.html
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=define:RAID+0

12. The OS does this for you already. It's called an association.

13. FTP is not port 20 but rather 20/21 (data/control). Also, active or
passive FTP? There could be other ports involved but relative to firewall
configuration, this is sufficient.

14, 15, 16, 17. If you have a Help Desk database and full documented
network then this information is easily obtained for anyone. If not, why
not?

18. Building any new offices in the near future? Your salesman should know.
You're looking for an engineer, not a salesman. If you have 50 computers,
30 users, no more than 25 at a time, you have budget issues and people are
not getting their bonuses because you're depleting the profits with
purchases of unneccessary equipment. Per user or per device?

19. A LAN Admin is not a SQL DBA! F. Ask for a raise. DBAs usually make
more money.

20. Why? You have SQL! E. Since you're now a developer, you develop stored
procedures and web applications so you do not need to purchase/install
additional software or distribute run-time licenses.

21. See 19.

22. Your job, because you obviously didn't plan for this. If you're looking
for the answer to be the MX record(s), that's BS, because you need to modify
forward and reverse lookup zones and not just the MX record(s).

23. How did this get past the current admin? a. Policies and procedures.
b. Weekly company sponsored beatings for violators out on the front lawn.

24. How is this relevant to their duties? Their job description is LAN
Admin, not Engineer and this is not a Network Technologies test, or
shouldn't be.

25. Why are TCP/IP printers setup on a Windows server? What did the server
ever do to deserve this? The first thing to do is change your design and
move the printers to a printing appliance or printer sharing devices and
quit bogging down the server needlessly. The server should not be an all
inclusive device.

26. There are more relevant issues here other than using a x-connect or ST
cable.

27. 100 meters but is the LAN Admin running cable? Is that a good use of
their resources? Who is supporting the users while the Admin is running
cable? How about, "Have you ever used a cable tester before and if so,
which one(s) are you familiar with? If your cable tasks are outsourced, WHY
ASK?

28. SMP doesn't work this way and your issue should not be looking for a
work around but perhaps a hardware upgrade or app redesign?! Did the LAN
Admin write this app? A better question would be, "Who allowed this app to
be introduced into a production environment?"

29. Why would you want to use a workstation for this process if it is so
demanding and why try to utilize it for other apps while it is in high gear?
Which is engineered better for CPU intensive applications, workstation or
server OS? Which one offers more support for SMP, additonal CPUs?

30. You verify cable with a cable tester, i.e. Pentascanner. That's not how
you verify a switch port either. Could be a multitude of problems,
including swap space, time outs, server storage (not disk space), drivers,
etc.

31. Your network is not setup correctly since a user had to tell you your
network is toast 1.5 days later. Your boss is obviously not qualified to
have rights on the network and should not have them just because of his/her
position. S/he should be added to the short list for the weekly beatings.
Network security should not be politically designed but most are. What did
you forget to do? RTFM and apply for a job where you were qualified, oh,
and shoot your boss, AFTER the beatings!!

32. MIS (Management Information Systems) applies to mainframe, not
client/server. You don't give an intern rights to setup a workstation when
you should already have a cookie cutter config and push technology to setup
the new system or at the very least verification before giving it to the
user. Where is the quality control? The worst thing you can do is give a
user a computer that is either misconfigured or incomplete. It reflects on
the whole department. It says, "We're complete idiots. No pieces missing!"
And, you don't lose data when you convert from FAT-32 to NTFS unless you're
referring to a rebuild vs using convert. In this case MIS = My Intern
Sucks!

33. System State but are you really using NTBackup for backups? Is that the
most important thing to know when backing up servers and AD? How about,
"How often do you test your backups for reliability?" If they answer, "I
set verification during the backup process.", they have no clue what you're
asking.

34. LAN Admin, not DBA!

35. You purchase Altiris and it will pay for itself so you have more time to
support the users. Add another hat to the LAN Admin., not to mention
required certification and training.

36. Where is the security for this network? You're looking for
HLKM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run but why was this able to
happen? If you waste your time trying to secure your network by
concentrating on the result, you're just wasting your time.

37. What does this have to do with the performance of their job? Are you
still running any systems that have a-d processors?

38. high-dollar application. What does this have to do with being qualified
to perform LAN Admin duties?

39. The user is asleep since they have to initiate.

40. What in the Hell is the intern doing with a laptop and does HIS laptop
imply his PERSONAL laptop? Get rid of XP Home and get XP Pro and slap the
intern around, daily.

---
Why are you now including PBX discovery when that is not part of the job
description?

I don't have that much of an issue of a self-assessment other than it
shouldn't be something you want filled out onsite and during an interview.
You asked this person to meet with you so you should have some level of
understanding of their abilities. A self-assessment can be asked for prior
to the meeting but you should not test before an interview is granted, as
that is a violation of law, or at least in the state where I live it is.
Don't ask someone to come in to visit with you and then put them in a room
alone to fill out an assessment. Time is valuable, yours AND theirs. You
only get one chance to make a first impression, don't blow it. One question
you should never ask is how much are you looking for? Two reasons why this
is a bad idea:

1. You're offering the job. You're not going to pay someone what they're
asking for unless it falls within a predetermined range to which you're
willing to agree to, so it's pointless and it's negative. If you're making
the offer, then make it, which leads me to my next point.

2. There is NO reason to EVER discuss compensation amounts UNTIL and ONLY IF
a FORMAL OFFER [in writing] has been made. This should also be negotiable.
Your job offer should not be a product on a shelf but rather exactly what it
is, an offer. Your applicants may make a counter offer which could mean
they look at this as a career, rather than a job and have an understanding
of their worth or marketability and it could mean they have a definite
interest in your company because why else would they try to negotiate. Or
it could mean they're just greedy but that cannot be determined by a
questionaire.

There was a terrific commercial not long ago and the interviewer asked,
"You're just out of college. How much are you looking to make?" The
applicant replied, "$150k". The interviewer continued and received boolean
response from the applicant. "How would you like a VP position?" GREAT!
"Your own company car?" Alright! "Your private secretary." Yes! "And full
use of the company jet?" The applicant asked, "Are you serious?" The
interviewer replied, "No, but you started it!"

: Thanks to anyone willing to help me out. You may email me your response
via my website (support request). I'd also be willing to furnish the
answers to anyone who wants them.

Asked here, answered here. I doubt the answers would be any use unless I
was applying for the job so I could give the answers you're looking for.
(O;=

Not all of these questions fall in the black/white categories and most are
not relevant to the position you're offering.

After reading the ad and the questionnaire, I'd only need to ask myself one
question, "Why would I want to work there?" If we are to base the
complexity, size and level of security of your network on what we have seen
here, I would grade it simple, unorganized, mismanaged, relatively small and
completely lacking of security. Surely your network is not in this state
but I can only grade it on what I have seen and I am an engineer, I don't
speculate. I seek the truth. I cannot fully understand what it is you're
seeking with this questionnaire other than to demonstrate these are some
issues you have dealt with there and/or you need filler for the
questionnaire so you threw in some trivia.

If you have a goofy job ad and a goofy questionnaire, you'll end up with a
goof supporting your network. (O:= If you're not getting qualified
candidates, perhaps it's not a bad pool of candidates but rather your lack
of knowledge in an area for which you have no experience. If you're not
qualified to obtain an position in HR, then my recommendation to you is to
turn this over to someone who is qualified and you'll probably start getting
better candidates.

Good luck.
 
Roland Hall said:
Why? You only get one chance to make a first impression. You're telling
all your candidates, "We don't believe anything you say and your resume is
most likely fake. You MUST take our version of the lie detector test.
We'll trust you and actually take the time to fully read your resume, if you
pass, since we didn't read past your name and phone number to call you in to
take it."

Personally I'd be wrapped if a potential employer came out and said this to
me, it would give me the chance to prove otherwise :-) Most of the resumes
out there are fairly exaggerated and it gives me a disadvantage because mine
is honest.

Michael Culley
 
Joe Richards said:
And WINS (or some form of NetBIOS resolution) in some environments. See
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=837391. Note this would mostly be
larger environments or multisite environments with disjoint name space. Exactly
the environments you can't use broadcast and don't want to use lmhosts in and
DNS won't do it unless you have a hellacious suffix search order list.

I run Exchange2000 here and WINS wasn't required. The question specifically
sated "required", yet it is in truth only *prefered* in certain situations.
So I disagree with requiring WINS unless you rephrase the test question to
acuartely describe the intended environment.
Ditto but add bat.
There were others worth comment but those are the ones that mostly stuck
out.

Sometimes you just gotta have a little fun with the questions.. :-)
 
Phillip Windell said:
31. You only restored only one server. You also forgot to get MS Support on
the phone and have them at least "stay with you" through the process so you
don't screw up such a potentially dangerous situation, ......since this
isn't something most Admins deal with everyday. Also don't forget the
required "public Boss beatings" to be held on Monday morning.

I think giving the boss a BOFH style introduction to the dangers of live
electricity is called for in this situation. Shortly followed by an
"unfortunate accident" for whoever gave him that much power in the first
place.

As for the questionaire, dump it. Ask general non-specific questions to
guage a candidates ability to think. If you have to ask something specific,
it needs to be both relevant and information that you'd need an instant
recall on. After all anyone can google obscure facts or look up port numbers
etc if required.

At lot of the questions seem to say far more about the kind of operation
you're running than about the candidate you hope to employ. If it genuinely
reflects your setup you should probably just get anyone who has a reasonable
idea of what they should be doing and hope they can sort things out for you.

Andy
 
Roland Hall said:
in message
developers, DBAs and System Engineers/Architects, respectively. People
working jobs, that cross these boundaries, work for a company that is not
paying them adequately, manipulating them, and/or is too small with too
small a budget to do so and probably has the mind set of, "it's a computer,
how difficult can it be?"

Hey! That's where I work! Are you spying on me or something? That's why I
never get really good at any one thing, because I have to spead myself
across these boundaries and be good enough to "poke and eye out" with about
everything, yet am never able to be an "expert" in anything. The brain
cells get thinner the futher you have to spread 'em.
issue. After all, is the admin now running cable? How many hats is that
and if he has to cover so many areas, is this a 6 figure income? Surely a

Alright! I demand a raise!........again......
 
Back
Top