Technical Question about Performance

  • Thread starter Thread starter pers
  • Start date Start date
P

pers

Hi all
I want to set up a web application for an organization that has some
agents in different cities.
I have 2 solutions and I want to know which is better and faster.
1-Like other sites put Asp.net pages and database in a host.
2-Putting asp.net pages in a local server but database in a host that local
server gets data from host.

thanks in advance
 
Hi all
I want to  set up a web application  for an organization that has some
agents in different cities.
I have 2 solutions and I want to know which is better and faster.
1-Like other sites put Asp.net  pages and database in a host.
2-Putting asp.net pages in a local server but database in a host that local
server gets data from  host.

thanks in advance
Click to expand...

While it's not very clear where it would make sense to have a local
(?) server for asp.net, in any case an access to a database on the
same host will be faster. It could be also more secure because in this
case the database can be behind a firewall (and you can't connect to
it directly).
 
I have some heavy pages and I want pages to be loaded locally and just get
data from database.
I thought it's good and efficient to just get data from server and pages
load locally and so server loads decrease.

Hi all
I want to set up a web application for an organization that has some
agents in different cities.
I have 2 solutions and I want to know which is better and faster.
1-Like other sites put Asp.net pages and database in a host.
2-Putting asp.net pages in a local server but database in a host that
local
server gets data from host.

thanks in advance
Click to expand...

While it's not very clear where it would make sense to have a local
(?) server for asp.net, in any case an access to a database on the
same host will be faster. It could be also more secure because in this
case the database can be behind a firewall (and you can't connect to
it directly).
 
Back
Top