Hi,
Panda_man said:
I am sorry ,too but you are the wrong guy here...
I DO NOT say that turning off and then off would prevent the SR
corruption. I just say that it is good to turn off and then on the
Restore function because there can be a corrupted one so he'll delete
it and then will automatically has a new one which would probably
be not corrupted.
I think a better approach would be to test System Restore rather than
deleting all existing restore points by disabling than enabling.
To do so create a new restore point named TEST.
Create a new empty folder on the desktop and name it TEST.
Now restore the system using the TEST restore point previously created.
You should receive a message that the restore was successful, and the
TEST folder should be gone from the desktop.
If the test was successful, that would indecate that all the previous
restore points are good and not corrupt. The reason for this is that all
the restore points previous to the TEST restore point were nessasary to
complete the restore.
Do you understand ?
And it is good to delete the restore points because users install and
then uninstall new programs which reg keys are saved in the system
restore and would be restored.
Yes, but wouldn't you rather have a restore point that has a few extra
reg key, rather than a system that will not boot?
Try uninstalling your av,for example, and some days later restore to
a state one or two days after removing the av and you'll see that
there are tracks of existment of that av....
I think you mean restoring to a day or two before the application was
removed!