R
RoS
I'm getting confused over the differences between system restore and having
a second copy of the OS on a separate partition.
I found System Restore in Win ME was always a bit of a loose cannon and
sometimes created bigger problems than it solved. What does it actually do?
Does it alter files in the OS or just registry settings? What happens to
apps or updates to apps installed after a restore point. Is it perhaps
wiser to have a spare 'clean' copy of the OS on board? At last I have
enough HD space for this to be feasible. I know that theoretically one
should never have to clean re-install an OS. Every problem is fixable. But
in the past I've always reached the point after about 18 months when
everything is beginning to creak and starting from fresh in the end is
quicker - and certainly more fool proof.
When is backing up the registry an alternative to System Restore, if ever?
RoS
a second copy of the OS on a separate partition.
I found System Restore in Win ME was always a bit of a loose cannon and
sometimes created bigger problems than it solved. What does it actually do?
Does it alter files in the OS or just registry settings? What happens to
apps or updates to apps installed after a restore point. Is it perhaps
wiser to have a spare 'clean' copy of the OS on board? At last I have
enough HD space for this to be feasible. I know that theoretically one
should never have to clean re-install an OS. Every problem is fixable. But
in the past I've always reached the point after about 18 months when
everything is beginning to creak and starting from fresh in the end is
quicker - and certainly more fool proof.
When is backing up the registry an alternative to System Restore, if ever?
RoS