G
Guest
I have read a few articles about ReadyBoost not giving much of a performance
gain on systems with large amounts of RAM, I'm not sure of the internal
workings of ReadyBoost but my 2GB system still frequently uses the swap-file.
So, would it create a greater performance increase to install the USB flash
device as a drive and then force windows to use this device and this device
alone for swap-file data?
Obviously the main concern here would be stability if the drive was removed
mid-session, which would obviously be disastrous, but I have a USB2.0 PCI
card which has an internal (as in on the card but inside the case) USB port,
using this I could be as sure of the USB stick staying connected as I could
of my graphics card not falling out.
Any thoughts on this before I give it a go?
On this tack, how long is it going to be before motherboard manufacturers
start either including flash-memory chips on their boards, or provide a
dedicated on-board USB port for flash drives?
gain on systems with large amounts of RAM, I'm not sure of the internal
workings of ReadyBoost but my 2GB system still frequently uses the swap-file.
So, would it create a greater performance increase to install the USB flash
device as a drive and then force windows to use this device and this device
alone for swap-file data?
Obviously the main concern here would be stability if the drive was removed
mid-session, which would obviously be disastrous, but I have a USB2.0 PCI
card which has an internal (as in on the card but inside the case) USB port,
using this I could be as sure of the USB stick staying connected as I could
of my graphics card not falling out.
Any thoughts on this before I give it a go?
On this tack, how long is it going to be before motherboard manufacturers
start either including flash-memory chips on their boards, or provide a
dedicated on-board USB port for flash drives?