John said:
I think what happens when a batch file successfully deletes the swapfile
is that Windows simply undeletes the swap file. And since it does so
before Windows finishes starting, there is absolutely overwriting-loss
of data and the restored swap file is simply the old one exactly.
That's why I suggested renaming it. See my comments, below, about 8MB.
That would reduce the frag prob mentioned by the other poster.
The
way to get around this would involve deleting the file and creating a
new blank file that you name win386.swp. This, however, might fu**
things up for the system. I don't know since I've never tried it.
LOL, Maybe on someone elses computer? Or a full backup to another HDD.
I just found an old post from the win98 ng, about how win98 *actually*
needed only 8MB swap, if there was enough RAM. I'd heard there were
several Win programs that checked for the existance of a swap file,
even if they never used it. (shrug) No telling if any of that means
anything to the discussion of using a RAMdisk with XP.
I'm eagerly awaiting the IDE flash drives. The last I saw was $600 for
1Gig, so it might be a while. They should be a bit easier to clean.