svchost.exe - application error upon start up of computer

  • Thread starter Thread starter athyne
  • Start date Start date
A

athyne

Joining the long list of svchost.exe errors! However, have seen
nothing that applies to this specific one. I have read anything from
it's a virus issue, to a problem with the Norton Anti-Virus to do a
repair off of cd. Any advice?

Detail:

svchost.exe - Application Error
The instruction at "0x745f2780" referenced memory at "0x00000000." The
memory could not be "read."
Click on ok to terminate the program
Click on cancel to bebug the program

When I clicked on cancel, nothing happened. The ok button seemed like
it was the default so I clicked on ok, then I got this:

Generic Host Process for Win 32 Series
Error Signature
szAppName:svchost.exe szAppVer:0.0.0.0 szModName:unknown
szModVer:0.0.0.0 offset:00000000

reporting details technical info I got:
C:\DOCUME"1\user\Locals"1\Temp\WERc25c.dir00\svchost.exe.mdmp
C:\DOCUME"1\user\Locals"1\Temp\WERc25c.dir00\appcompat.txt

Any help would be appreciated! Thank you!
 
Go here to end all your worries....it works......
http://www.infohq.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard/topic.cgi?forum=4&topic=181
"I just resolved my issue by turning off automatic updates, reboot, then
manually going to windows updates and installing the updates, turing on
automatic updates, reboot."
I wonder why Microsoft dosn't know this ?

It seems that code has to do with some sort of Pentium program error
detection. I would assume that my machine failed to autoinstall an update
and this error was the result...please try and I hope this helps you out.


0x745f2780
 
Thank you for this solution. My identical problem was triggered by the
Windows Automatic Security Update. Amazing how I am beginning to dread
Tuesdays to see what MS will do to screw up my day today. The next PC I'm
buying will be a MAC!
Jim
 
thufferd said:
I received the following error messages in standard boot as well as all
the safe boot options.
Click to expand...
<snip - hijack post to a really old thread>

You thought the original participants in a 3-year old thread that you tried
to hijack are still watching it?
 
Back
Top