Sun's 4-way Opteron V40z server

  • Thread starter Thread starter YKhan
  • Start date Start date
Y

YKhan

I thought it interesting how high the state of the art in x86 server
technology is these days. The range of features I'm seeing here were
only available in enterprise Unix servers of only a couple of years
ago. Just about everything seems to be hot-swappable, and there's
lights-out management capabilities, among other things.

http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2354

Yousuf Khan
 
I thought it interesting how high the state of the art in x86 server
technology is these days. The range of features I'm seeing here were
only available in enterprise Unix servers of only a couple of years
ago. Just about everything seems to be hot-swappable, and there's
lights-out management capabilities, among other things.

http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=2354
Click to expand...

$5000/processor gets you a nice Altix with a real processor. ;-).

RM
 
Them Newisys boys did their homework!
$5000/processor gets you a nice Altix with a real processor. ;-).
Click to expand...

And no software to run on that processor :>

Actually it would be rather nice to see a straight-up, head to head
comparison of this Opteron-based Sun Fire v40z vs. the Itanium based
SGI Altrix 350 vs. the Power5 based IBM p630. All three sell in the
same basic price range, all are backed by (presumably) solid support
and all run Linux.

Of course, doing such a task would probably be a bit beyond most of
the hardware review websites, not to mention the fact that it would be
extraordinarily difficult to give a really meaningful picture of
performance for more than a narrow handful of applications.
 
Robert said:
This is a year-old link, but it still works:

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-5138719.html
Click to expand...

It seems to be atypically priced for that market category. According to
this statement:
Among the Altix 350's competitors are IBM's p650, an eight-processor system with a starting price of about $27,000 for a dual-processor configuration; Hewlett-Packard's four-processor rx5670, with a starting price of about $22,000; and Sun Microsystems' V880z, an eight-processor machine with a starting price of about $60,000.
Click to expand...


Also this statement makes no sense:
Moving to Intel's Itanium chips and to Linux offers the company a chance to reduce its research and development expenses.
Click to expand...

If it's trying to reduce R&D $'s, then what's it doing developing things
like NUMAflex specifically for Itanium anyways?

Yousuf Khan
 
It seems to be atypically priced for that market category. According to
this statement:
Click to expand...
But there is "Hewlett-Packard's four-processor rx5670, with a starting
price of about $22,000."

My point wasn't intended to be taken altogether seriously, as
indicated by the ;-) in my first post to this thread. $/processor is
just one very crude way of normalizing the list prices of computers,
which prices themselves may bear little resemblance to the price at
which hardware is actually sold, especially if you count all the
extras that are thrown in to an actual sale.
Also this statement makes no sense:


If it's trying to reduce R&D $'s, then what's it doing developing things
like NUMAflex specifically for Itanium anyways?
Click to expand...
NUMAflex doesn't have anything to do specifically with Itanium. If
Itanium went away, you might see Opteron connected with NUMAflex. The
Altix 350 allows you to run a single system image on a cluster of four
boxes with 4P each, something you can't do on a do-it-yourself
cluster. SGI uses infiniband to create larger clusters.

RM
 
Robert said:
NUMAflex doesn't have anything to do specifically with Itanium. If
Itanium went away, you might see Opteron connected with NUMAflex. The
Altix 350 allows you to run a single system image on a cluster of four
boxes with 4P each, something you can't do on a do-it-yourself
cluster. SGI uses infiniband to create larger clusters.
Click to expand...

But still, it must require some redesigns to get it to interface with
each different kind of bus architecture to which it needs to connect,
while keeping the latency down.

Yousuf Khan
 
But still, it must require some redesigns to get it to interface with
each different kind of bus architecture to which it needs to connect,
while keeping the latency down.
Click to expand...
Itanium was (and is) SGI's chosen successor to MIPS. One might ask
what other choices SGI might have made, but they already have a
significant investment in Itanium.

RM
 
Robert said:
Itanium was (and is) SGI's chosen successor to MIPS. One might ask
what other choices SGI might have made, but they already have a
significant investment in Itanium.
Click to expand...

Which brings it back to, if it was trying to save money on R&D costs,
why isn't it just using standard Itanium chipsets?

Yousuf Khan
 
Which brings it back to, if it was trying to save money on R&D costs,
why isn't it just using standard Itanium chipsets?
Click to expand...

You could have asked the same question of HP, which blew the
competition away with its zx1 chipset for Itanium. See my post under
the hurricane thread.

One possible explanation is that the Intel (and IBM) chipsets were
aimed at a different market. I'm sure that SGI would love to be
selling into the server market, but I don't think they do. Another
reason why my comment about the Altix wasn't intended to be taken
seriously.

RM
 
Back
Top