I guess I'm just to laid-back to get upset about 3 seconds.
When I was flying for a living, plus/minus three minutes at
any checkpoint was just fine. I remember when a long
distance phone call was a big deal, taking hours to get
through sometimes.
I remember when a recalc on a 100 line spreadsheet took
almost a minute on my first laptop PC [Toshiba T1000, 4.77
MHz and 1.2 MB of RAM with the memory expansion card and
only a 720 KB floppy]
But that is the beauty of the modern PC, fast and you can
set it up[ any way you want it.
in message The point becomes important here, when we are talking about
boot time in seconds. "Just press Enter" is OK and agreed,
but most don't want that extra step.
and there is still 26 seconds to go, just press enter
There is still few seconds to go: that's the main factor
here. I'd convert that wait time to boot-up time by reducing
the time-out value.
--
Ramesh - Microsoft MVP
Windows XP Shell
http://www.mvps.org/sramesh2k
ExportZone - for Internet Explorer:
http://www.mvps.org/sramesh2k/ExportZone.htm
in message The point is it isn't too important, if you turn the
computer ON and go to the bathroom or to the kitchen to brew
a cup, it will time out and be booted before you get back.
But if you just set away for a sip of water and come back
and there is still 26 seconds to go, just press enter and
the screen will scroll all those unreadable lines of code
and open the logon screen in 3 more seconds, at least mine
does.
in message Both are valid points, Jim. Away for a long time, yes you're
right. As Ken says, I use 3 second time-out, reason: after I
switch-on the PC, I go away to turn on the fans/AC/Windows
[no MS Windows]. I'll be back in 30 seconds; meanwhile, I'd
love to see Windows fully loaded. Here, 3 second timeout is
ideal, not a big deal/issue though.
--
Ramesh - Microsoft MVP
Windows XP Shell
http://www.mvps.org/sramesh2k
ExportZone - for Internet Explorer:
http://www.mvps.org/sramesh2k/ExportZone.htm
in message I am usually in the other room too, but if you are away, who
cares how long it takes, 3 seconds or 30? But if you are
there, just press the enter key as soon as the boot menu
appears.
message | In |
| Jim Macklin <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> typed:
|
| > There is no delay if you press enter.
|
|
| Many people, myself included, power up the computer and
leave the
| room to do other things. We don't stick around waiting to
press
| enter when required. The 27 seconds saved by having a
| three-second default instead of 30 isn't earthshaking, but
since
| it's so easy to achieve, why not do so?
|
| --
| Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| Please reply to the newsgroup
|
|
|
| > "Ken Blake, MVP" <
[email protected]>
wrote in
| > message | >| In | >| William B. Lurie <
[email protected]> typed:
| >|
| >| > Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
| >| >> In | >| >> William B. Lurie <
[email protected]> typed:
| >| >>
| >| >>
| >| >>>Now that you kind MVPs have straightened me out, and
my
| >| >>>machine is working as well as can be expected, I
have
| >| >>>one rather minor request. In booting up, I am now
given
| >| >>>a choice of starting Windows, or going to Recovery
Console.
| >| >>>Is there a way of eliminating this choice, but
leaving
| >| >>>it so that I can go to Recovery Console some time in
| >| >>>the future when I need it? Thank you.
| >| >>
| >| >>
| >| >>
| >| >>
| >| >> My preference is to keep that choice, but lower the
setting
| for
| >| >> how long the menu stays up before taking the default
choice
| of
| >| >> starting Windows. By default, the menu stays up for
30
| seconds,
| >| >> but I lower it to 3 seconds by making the first two
lines
| of
| >| >> boot.ini read
| >| >>
| >| >> [boot loader]
| >| >> timeout=3
| >| >>
| >| > Thanks to all of you for prompt answers. I think it
makes
| most
| >| > sense to leave it set at something I can grab when I
need
| other
| >| > than normal XP startup.... 3 seconds is short, 30 too
long.
| > Thanks
| >| again.
| >|
| >|
| >| You're welcome, Bill. Glad to help.
| >|
| >| --
| >| Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
| >| Please reply to the newsgroup
|
|