J
JJ
Hi all.....45 new.....12678 total. Enjoy your evening. JJ
JJ said:Hi all.....45 new.....12678 total. Enjoy your evening. JJ
Randy Knobloch said:Thanks, JJ ! Appreciated.
Stu said:Thank you so much JJ. RU still soldering on with IE6. I`m REALLY concerned
....
robinb said:JJ go to firefox then you do not have to concern yourself with ie
it is lighter on memory and MUCH safer than ie
robinb said:the proof is in the pudding
just try it
I have it on 80 machines- all clients love it and will also tell me it loads
faster than ie, uses less memory and has better security than ie
here is some opinons of those who feel the same way
http://onlinebusiness.about.com/od/dailyoperations/a/firefox3.htm
http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20080605/mozilla-firefox-30-is-the-best-browser-for-web-for-now/
http://thenextweb.com/2009/07/20/firefox-35-browser-os/
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2349494,00.asp
I could keep going,,,,but
Stu said:Thank you so much JJ. RU still soldering on with IE6. I`m REALLY concerned
....
Somehow I'm not converted. ;-)
If they had tested Firefox 3.5 with NoScript it would have been more
meaningful and what is that about Firefox 3.5 being crash happy? That hasn't
been my experience.
Perhaps they should open their testing suite and procedures to public
scrutiny. Earlier tests by NSS Labs have come under heavy criticism.
http://www.thetechherald.com/articl...e-NSS-Labs-report-touting-the-benefits-of-IE8
YMMV