SpywareBlaster Update.......7/15/2004

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heather
  • Start date Start date
H

Heather

Courtesy of Silj in the MS ng's.........Heather
------------------------------------------------------------

32 New items - 3054 total.
Please use the internal update engine to obtain the updates.

For those of you not running Spyware Blaster, you may obtain a copy here:
http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/sbupdate.html

~Silj
_________________
Randy Knobloch aka siljaline
MS-MVP Windows (IE/OE) AH-VSOP
_________________________________
 
After a weekend rollercoaster ride I seem to be back in the saddle, Heather.
Shane helped me out a lot.
Just one question: where is 'Art', I believe was his name?
I can't find him in either of these two NG's.
Not that it really matters.

Things are looking up;

Harry, old and weary.
 
Hello Art, pleased to meet you.
Seem to remember seeing that ID before.
Glad to be here.

Harry.
 
Hi, Harry,

A few months ago Art popped into ME General. There was a debate on the
advisability of using IEradicator in ME and it's experiments that came out
of that confirmed to me it should only be used if about to re-install
Windows.

Small world, isn't it?

(btw someone'll have a go at you for top-posting, here, eventually. So you
should only really do it to annoy <vbg>)


Shane
 
Hi, Harry,

A few months ago Art popped into ME General. There was a debate on the
advisability of using IEradicator in ME and it's experiments that came out
of that confirmed to me it should only be used if about to re-install
Windows.

That bad? :) I had been running Win ME with IE eradicated. I hadn't
noticed the missing OS stuff since I don't use it. It was the alleged
destruction of System File Protect that primarily bothered me. That
does seem like a good OS feature. Plus the fact that you can't
recommend something that many users will find too destructive of other
portions of the OS as well. But I had run Win 98 original with IE
eradicated for years.
Small world, isn't it?

(btw someone'll have a go at you for top-posting, here, eventually. So you
should only really do it to annoy <vbg>)

Since we know you MS groupies are top posting addicts, and you do it
here just to be annoying, it won't work :)


Art
http://www.epix.net/~artnpeg
 
That bad? :) I had been running Win ME with IE eradicated. I hadn't
noticed the missing OS stuff since I don't use it. It was the alleged
destruction of System File Protect that primarily bothered me. That
does seem like a good OS feature. Plus the fact that you can't
recommend something that many users will find too destructive of other
portions of the OS as well. But I had run Win 98 original with IE
eradicated for years.


Since we know you MS groupies are top posting addicts, and you do it
here just to be annoying, it won't work :)

LOL.....we don't do it to be annoying (altho you rise to the bait from time
to time, grin). We do it because it is the way the MS groups prefer and we
are on those more than on here. No other reason than that. I try to
intersperse or bottom post (like now), but I find THAT annoying!! (VBG)

XX Heather
 
That bad? :) I had been running Win ME with IE eradicated. I hadn't
noticed the missing OS stuff since I don't use it. It was the alleged
destruction of System File Protect that primarily bothered me. That
does seem like a good OS feature.

Well, yes, that's the main thing to my mind. You can get the original
System.cat back by renaming Catalog.cab, but updates need re-installing to
get the cat files back for SFP to monitor the updated files. Or you can back
them all up first and replace them before re-enabling Statemgr.exe in the
registry after.
Plus the fact that you can't
recommend something that many users will find too destructive of other
portions of the OS as well.

I think that's probably the bottom line.
But I had run Win 98 original with IE
eradicated for years.

I was going to give it a go, but instead I've stopped using 98SE. I did
partially relent and re-install the DOS portion only. But other than MS-DOS
7.10 I've decided to stop using anything older than ME.
Since we know you MS groupies are top posting addicts, and you do it
here just to be annoying, it won't work :)

LOL! Maybe I'll just argue about System Restore! ;-)


Shane
 
Talking about System Restore, Shane. That subject came up when I was going
to run WMPlayer Setup and was told I needed to get Fix Q290700 first. So I
did and installed it.
Boy, did I think I was in trouble aftter that. Most of my quick link icons
were missing and local disk E had traded places with removable zip drive H.
Resigned to the fact I would have to resort tho the news group, I shut down
and started up again. Whoallah, everything was allright again.
The only visible change was that System Restore's past was erased and a new
automatic restore point created.
That's fine with me, because my Media Player 9 works fine now, which wasn't
the case before, when I got an error message and telling me to run setup.
Now the system is working good.
Hope it stays that way, Shane.

Harry.
 
Talking about System Restore, Shane. That subject came up when I was going
to run WMPlayer Setup and was told I needed to get Fix Q290700 first. So I
did and installed it.

Yeah, interesting that. WMP9 can't be uninstalled but you can roll back to
before you installed it using SR. Which sensibly means you've got about a
week to decide if you're going to keep it. Anyway, so the installer looks
for 290700 - without which SR won't work. Yet the Windows Update Security CD
installs 290700 regardless of whether it already has been - which of course,
if it has, flushes your restore points. I think that maybe demonstrates
Microsoft's ambivalence towards SR, at least in ME. Or maybe between
departments at Redmond. But why they couldn't have used the same routine on
the CD as they use in WMP9's installer beats me!
Boy, did I think I was in trouble aftter that. Most of my quick link icons
were missing and local disk E had traded places with removable zip drive H.
Resigned to the fact I would have to resort tho the news group, I shut down
and started up again. Whoallah, everything was allright again.
The only visible change was that System Restore's past was erased and a new
automatic restore point created.

You've got a retail ME cd haven't you, Harry? The reason I ask is you can
burn the updated contents of C:\Windows\Options\Install (if retail)
....\Options\CABS (if OEM) and if you install from that - though fingers
crossed you'll never need to re-install ME again - it does so with the SR
update already applied. Though Windows Update says it isn't.

While you're at this, here's something you really ought to do. Open
C:\Windows\Scanreg.ini and add as the last line the following:

Files=11,vmm32.vxd

this will cause vmm32.vxd to be backed up along with the registry each day.
Usually if vmm32.vxd is damaged you have to re-install Windows, so it's very
useful to always have several good copies of it.
That's fine with me, because my Media Player 9 works fine now, which wasn't
the case before, when I got an error message and telling me to run setup.
Now the system is working good.
Hope it stays that way, Shane.

Fingers crossed! ;-)

Just about in time for WMP10 (if it's not solely for NT-based systems - the
current beta is). The beta's working fine on my XP.

btw DirectX 9.0c is available for download now - though only the developer's
redistributable which means you have to get the full 35 MB package. Probably
pretty pointless if what you've got's working OK now.


Shane
 
Shane:
Diagnostics tells me that the install path is:
C:\Windows\Options\Install,
meaning my version of ME is retail which, of course I didn't realize before
and by the same token not knowing the difference.
I did add the line, as you suggested.
That should make it perfect, shouldn't it?
Thanks so much for all your valuable, detailed help.

Harry, old but content.
 
Shane said:
Well, okelly dokelly, at least!


No problem, Harry.


That reminds me, I've got three-quarters of a bottle of wine in the fridge!
Cheers!


Shane

Wish I could join you.
Harry.
 
Back
Top