Z
Zodiacal
whats the least mhz and memory you would dare run access97 with windows
2000?
2000?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
K
Kristyn Wagoner [MSFT]
Hi Zodiacal -
The recommended minimum requirements are listed in the following article.
159366 ACC97: Setup Requirements for Microsoft Access 97
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=159366
Mimimum is 486 Processor and 16mgs RAM. However, for every application you
want to run simultaneously, you will need to increase that.
Hope that helps!
--
Kristyn Wagoner
Microsoft PSS
Please do not reply directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup
purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
The recommended minimum requirements are listed in the following article.
159366 ACC97: Setup Requirements for Microsoft Access 97
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=159366
Mimimum is 486 Processor and 16mgs RAM. However, for every application you
want to run simultaneously, you will need to increase that.
Hope that helps!
--
Kristyn Wagoner
Microsoft PSS
Please do not reply directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup
purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Z
Zodiacal
on windows 2000 tho..
Kristyn Wagoner said:Hi Zodiacal -
The recommended minimum requirements are listed in the following article.
159366 ACC97: Setup Requirements for Microsoft Access 97
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=159366
Mimimum is 486 Processor and 16mgs RAM. However, for every application you
want to run simultaneously, you will need to increase that.
Hope that helps!
--
Kristyn Wagoner
Microsoft PSS
Please do not reply directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup
purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
T
Tony Toews
Zodiacal said:whats the least mhz and memory you would dare run access97 with windows
2000?
A bare bones Windows 2000 system takes 52 Mb. (According to a test
session I have running inside VMWare.) But by the time you load on
anti virus, CD Rom burner drivers, software firewall, etc, this could
be as much as another 80 to 100 Mb.
You'll have to take a look at your own environment to decide what is
acceptable but I'd say 128 Mb as a minimum. I'd prefer 256 to give
lots of room for other apps to be running.
As far as Mhz goes you I've happily run A97 on a P133 I think. It
might even happily run on a 486 just be kinda sluggish.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
A
Albert D. Kallal
With a fast hard disk, and 256k of memory, a 600 mhz pc is more then plenty
to run a demanding ms-access application.
If I was stuck, and the users ONLY run ms-access, then a 450mhz pc with only
64 megs of ram would be ok. (assuming the user keeps other applications
closed while running ms-access).
The problem is not windows 2000, and ms-access, it is training the user not
load up all kinds of other garbage at start-up, and to not run other
applications at the same time. If no other applications are loaded, and the
start of the pc is very clean, then 64 megs of ram on win2000 is workable.
It really depends on how much junk is on the pc. The real deciding factor
here is how much other junk runs on the pc. I have seen screen savers that
require more resources then ms-access!
to run a demanding ms-access application.
If I was stuck, and the users ONLY run ms-access, then a 450mhz pc with only
64 megs of ram would be ok. (assuming the user keeps other applications
closed while running ms-access).
The problem is not windows 2000, and ms-access, it is training the user not
load up all kinds of other garbage at start-up, and to not run other
applications at the same time. If no other applications are loaded, and the
start of the pc is very clean, then 64 megs of ram on win2000 is workable.
It really depends on how much junk is on the pc. The real deciding factor
here is how much other junk runs on the pc. I have seen screen savers that
require more resources then ms-access!