Spammer in Love...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wrangler
  • Start date Start date
W

Wrangler

OK,

So, the spammers have continued to prove how stupid they are...
From: "Barbra N. Bishop" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:51:53 -0000
To: [Me]
Subject: I love you

Vii3codz4en,Xan6rex, via4kgra, and so much more
Save your money for better things
Our prices are half off the competitors
=Find out now= <http://transport.rac240sx.com/r3/?d=FPR&a=26>

How many companies will be blocking "I Love You" as a subject line :)

I guess this particular spammer does not know their viruses otherwise they
would have realised that quite a few of their mails will never reach its
destination :)

My heart bleeds... Not!

..\/.artin
 
Wrangler said:
So, the spammers have continued to prove how stupid they are...
From: "Barbra N. Bishop" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:51:53 -0000
To: [Me]
Subject: I love you
How many companies will be blocking "I Love You" as a subject line :)

I guess this particular spammer does not know their viruses otherwise they
would have realised that quite a few of their mails will never reach its
destination :)

Presumably you think you are making a smart comment about (now very old and
"stale") filters to block VBS/LoveLetter.A aka "LoveBug" aka "ILOVEYOU"???

If so, any company that had a filter to block such Email based on a Subject:
line of "I love you" (case-insensitively) would have been out of luck, for
as is very well documented all over the net, LoveLetter.A used "ILOVEYOU" as
its Subject: line for its outgoing Email messages...
My heart bleeds... Not!

I'd get that looked at! 8-)
 
The voice of "Nick FitzGerald" drifted in on the cyber-winds,
from the sea of virtual chaos...
"Wrangler" <[email protected]> wrote:

Presumably you think you are making a smart comment about (now
very old and "stale") filters to block VBS/LoveLetter.A aka
"LoveBug" aka "ILOVEYOU"???

If so, any company that had a filter to block such Email based on
a Subject: line of "I love you" (case-insensitively) would have
been out of luck, for as is very well documented all over the net,
LoveLetter.A used "ILOVEYOU" as its Subject: line for its outgoing
Email messages...


How about "i.?love.?you" or "i\s?love\s?you"...
That Regex caught all the variants back when I still did email
filtering. It wasn't as affective as just gutting un-trusted binaries
and emails over 10K, but it was still useful for a time.
 
The ironicly named "Tech Zero said:
How about "i.?love.?you" or "i\s?love\s?you"...

How about it?
That Regex caught all the variants back when I still did email
filtering. It wasn't as affective as just gutting un-trusted binaries
and emails over 10K, but it was still useful for a time.

What a load of shite -- well, unless you were in charge of Email filtering
until sometime before LoveLetter.B hit the net (what was the delta from
LoveLetter.A to that again?? A bit less than 48 hours IIRC...).

Explain how that regex caught LoveLetter.B's "Susitikim shi vakara kavos
puodukui..." Subject: line, or LoveLetter.C's "FW: Joke" or ...

Perhaps you get the point now?
 
Back
Top