Spamfighter vs. K9?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christer Löfkvist
  • Start date Start date
C

Christer Löfkvist

Anyone here who can guide me wheter one of these are better than the other?
Best regards from Sweden

--
Christer Löfkvist
Kennel Roseole´s
Ärentuna, Östa
S-743 91 Storvreta
+46(0)18-31 41 49
+46(0)706-94 74 17
www.roseoles.nu
 
On my experience SpamPal is the most complete, supports DNSBL & Bayesian
filtering (I prefer DNSBL as it has proven tob e more reliable) and is the
only freeware anti-spam program that supports IMAP.
 
On my experience SpamPal is the most complete, supports DNSBL & Bayesian
filtering (I prefer DNSBL as it has proven tob e more reliable) and is the
only freeware anti-spam program that supports IMAP.
Click to expand...

Ok, K9 doesn't IMAP, but it has bayes+dnsbl+regexp+white/black...
now it's just a matter of deciding what fills the bill; as a note I've
been using spamihilator (www.spamihilator.com) for a while and I
can say I like it too (it even allows you to write your own plugins)
 
Back
Top