D
David Calzada
Sorry for my bad english.
I think I have found a serious bug in software restriction policies.
Can someone test this issue?:
If you have two volumes or partitions, like C:\ and E:\, and if you setup
SRS
with default settings and you DO NOT ALLOW E:\ path in SRS you cannot open
..txt files (as an example) or whatever.
And things get A LOT WORSE when you use folder redirection of user's folders
to E:\ drive, especially if you redirect the "desktop" folder. Internet
Explorer WILL NOT OPEN!!!
Someone has similar issues? Any idea?
Some months ago did some tests with SRS on Windows XP and found multiple
issues with path rules, especially using registry values or wildcards in
path values.
I think that the parser (or whatever) in SRS should be highly improved.
Is this a place for reporting bugs to Microsoft?
Sorry for my bad english.
I think I have found a serious bug in software restriction policies.
Can someone test this issue?:
If you have two volumes or partitions, like C:\ and E:\, and if you setup
SRS
with default settings and you DO NOT ALLOW E:\ path in SRS you cannot open
..txt files (as an example) or whatever.
And things get A LOT WORSE when you use folder redirection of user's folders
to E:\ drive, especially if you redirect the "desktop" folder. Internet
Explorer WILL NOT OPEN!!!
Someone has similar issues? Any idea?
Some months ago did some tests with SRS on Windows XP and found multiple
issues with path rules, especially using registry values or wildcards in
path values.
I think that the parser (or whatever) in SRS should be highly improved.
Is this a place for reporting bugs to Microsoft?
Sorry for my bad english.