Hi;
I live in a very rural area, and can only connect
to the internet via modem.
The connection here rarely ever goes over 28,800
(I have no other noise on the lines).
Can anyone tell me what kind of modem is better:
a ISA or a PCI?
When it comes right down to it, even if you connect at v92 speeds,
it's going to be way slower than the ISA bus, so when it comes to
modems, the slot type really doesn't matter. The big consideration if
your machine can accept both ISA and PCI modems is that when you
upgrade, the newer machine won't have ISA slots, so an ISA modem will
already be obsolete when you buy it. In that one respect, a PCI modem
would be better.
And, does anyone know how to tell if a modem is a
'software' or 'hardware' modem?
Look at the included driver. If the file is pretty small (or works
with the generic driver found in windows), then it's a hardware modem.
The driver layer is fairly simple and small for hardware modems
because it doesn't have to emulate as much stuff. On a modern
machine, it really doesn't matter much whether you get a hardware or
software modem. On a slower machine (less than a Pentium 166), then
you may get dropped connections, system crashes, slow downs (showing
as actual system slow down, as well as high latency) as the machine
tries to grab CPU time to do the modem emulation. This isn't much of
an issue these days, because today's machines have more than enough
horse power to do the emulation reliably.
At this point, the only issue when it comes to a software modem is
that you will have problems trying to get it working in DOS. In
Linux, there's been some progress towards a generic soft modem driver,
but I don't think anyone's done anything similar for DOS yet.