T
Tom Jubb
I am working on a friends laptop after reports of huge amounts of
incoming spam. I have confirmed that this machine was infected with
the w32.Beagle.Cl@mm and W32.Sober.X@mm viruses. They have both been
cleaned with Norton AntiVirus and I have confirmed this by looking for
the registry keys these add and they are no longer there. Here's where
my question comes in. When I check this persons email with Outlook
2003 I get huge amounts of spam coming in to the inbox. After it
downloads 200 or so messages with the bulk of them identical, I then do
another send/recieve and it starts to download 162 new junk messages
with just about all of them the same identical message. I have
confirmed that this behaviour DOES NOT ocurr on another unifected
machine. So it's not pulling these multiple identical junk messages
from their usual SMTP server. It's as if it's coming from another mail
server that I can't identify.
Can anyone shed any light on what is going on here?
BTW, I've also run CA Pest Patrol and it cleaned up 50 or so spyware
modules.
Thanks,
Tom
incoming spam. I have confirmed that this machine was infected with
the w32.Beagle.Cl@mm and W32.Sober.X@mm viruses. They have both been
cleaned with Norton AntiVirus and I have confirmed this by looking for
the registry keys these add and they are no longer there. Here's where
my question comes in. When I check this persons email with Outlook
2003 I get huge amounts of spam coming in to the inbox. After it
downloads 200 or so messages with the bulk of them identical, I then do
another send/recieve and it starts to download 162 new junk messages
with just about all of them the same identical message. I have
confirmed that this behaviour DOES NOT ocurr on another unifected
machine. So it's not pulling these multiple identical junk messages
from their usual SMTP server. It's as if it's coming from another mail
server that I can't identify.
Can anyone shed any light on what is going on here?
BTW, I've also run CA Pest Patrol and it cleaned up 50 or so spyware
modules.
Thanks,
Tom