G
Guest
Hi,
I have trouble with performance on Windows 2000 Server (dual processor, 1GB RAM, ..,DHCP, switch, Lan 10/100) and clients WIndows xp, Windows 2000 workstation. Our application is performing very slow regarding all read/write operations with ISAM database.
I tested network with instrument (Fluke) but there was only 5-10% utilization when our application performed read/write actions. It is interesting, that when copying files accross network I got 50-60% utilization and quite normal speed. And of course zero packages lost!
I also tested with independent network test application TestIO.EXE(from http://www.support.tabs3.com/main/r10054.htm) and I got the folowing results:
- 0.5 Mb/Sec read/write when executing test application from local computer on server (!?!?!)
- 20 Mb/Sec read/write when executing test application on local computer
- 25 Mb/Sec read/write when executing test application on server computer (logged as administrator on server)
I tried with OpLocks but there was no difference.
I would appreciate any idea.
Thanks,
Joze Gerjevic
I have trouble with performance on Windows 2000 Server (dual processor, 1GB RAM, ..,DHCP, switch, Lan 10/100) and clients WIndows xp, Windows 2000 workstation. Our application is performing very slow regarding all read/write operations with ISAM database.
I tested network with instrument (Fluke) but there was only 5-10% utilization when our application performed read/write actions. It is interesting, that when copying files accross network I got 50-60% utilization and quite normal speed. And of course zero packages lost!
I also tested with independent network test application TestIO.EXE(from http://www.support.tabs3.com/main/r10054.htm) and I got the folowing results:
- 0.5 Mb/Sec read/write when executing test application from local computer on server (!?!?!)
- 20 Mb/Sec read/write when executing test application on local computer
- 25 Mb/Sec read/write when executing test application on server computer (logged as administrator on server)
I tried with OpLocks but there was no difference.
I would appreciate any idea.
Thanks,
Joze Gerjevic