Sick of Vista Bashing!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Telstar
  • Start date Start date
T

Telstar

I am sick of this.

Everyone bashing Vista, go to Amazon.com and look at the user reviews of XP
in 2005. They are still there. One person opines that XP is worthless and
he is returning to reliable ME!!!!!
 
This is just amazing. I can believe it. I've known for some time that Vista
bashers are either crooks with ulterior motives or whiners who have trouble
across the whole range of problems (perhaps simply depressed) or Vista just
over their head intellectually.

Could you provide a link please.

I was actually late in my switching from Win2K to XP which I regret now
bitterly. My idea was however just opposite. For some reason I believed that
more picturesque environment in XP was not that professional and I with my
high demand for computations and data crunching would be in trouble. I
realized 3 years into XP era that I was wrong, that XP was much more
superior and I had to switch in a hurry. I caught Vista 6 months after its
RTM and for Vienna I will do Beta I from day one.
 
I am sick of this.

Everyone bashing Vista, go to Amazon.com and look at the user reviews
of XP in 2005. They are still there. One person opines that XP is
worthless and he is returning to reliable ME!!!!!

You would hope that with so many talented people, so much money and
experience in releasing bad operating systems, Microsoft will finally
be able to make a first solid release.
VISTA was a huge disappointment to say the least. VISTA will be
replaced by Windows 7 (2010), Microsoft has completely revamped their OS team to bring it out, which will use a
new memory model. Do you still think people are bashing it? It is simply a bad, cheap
attempt to clone MAC OS, and by the way, Leopard is not much better.
Vista is incompatible with many things that are running on XP, which
was made by the same company, it has significant networking issues,
hardware issues, software issues, third party software issues. In
short, it did not live up to it's hype. Just read the post in this
forum..
 
This is just amazing. I can believe it. I've known for some time that
Vista bashers are either crooks with ulterior motives or whiners who
have trouble across the whole range of problems (perhaps simply
depressed) or Vista just over their head intellectually.

Read my reply above. A good OS is the one that works for you best.
Reading the posts in this NG presents a different case.
 
I maintain and use ~200 machines with ME, W2K, XP and Linux.
Don't ask me about the AS-400/800s, I might go postal!
I have a couple of Vista machines at home (out of 14), but refuse to add any
to my LAN.
I have yet to see any compelling reason to do so.
People can say 'improved security' all year, but I don't see it.
All I see is annoyance to the users.
I was hoping MS would get it right with Vista, but I was sadly disappointed
throughout Beta and into RTM.
Even SP1 isn't much of an improvement.
MS didn't listen to my input, they knew what they wanted and pushed it out
as they wanted it...too bad they were looking in the rearview mirror instead
of out the windshield.
I advise people to suffer through it if they must get a new machine,
otherwise stick with what is currently working for them!
And yes, I have done many upgrades/repairs on XP machines, to extend their
life, instead of recommending new systems with this thing they call Vista
installed.
I can make Vista work, but WHY?
 
Sure there were few people who thought xp had problems...
but they were an insignificant minority. Back then when I came across a few
(yes ONLY a few) people that said that, I looked at them as if they were
aliens from another planet. They had no idea what they were talking about.
But vista is a totally different story.

with Vista the vast MAJORITY and BUSINESSES are avoiding vista like the
plague.

Its not anyone's fault for the bashing but Vista itself.

All MS had to do was make a VERY GOOD OS that most people in the world would
love.

It was within their capabilities but they blundered badly.

You cant expect all the world to just sit and take it from the rear... and
say, it hurts but I like it.
 
You are probably a black Muslim communist descended from the Mayans, who is
sick and broke.

And you hate yourself. That's why you hate everyone else.

MORON! I have never seen a more STUPID person than you on Usenet, you are
even worse than FRANK!
 
Telstar said:
I am sick of this.

Get used to it.
Everyone bashing Vista, go to Amazon.com and look at the user reviews of XP
in 2005. They are still there. One person opines that XP is worthless and
he is returning to reliable ME!!!!!

In the last year, only 39 percent of the new computers were shipped with
Vista pre-installed, while back in 2002 Windows XP was credited with a
market share of 67 percent in the new computer sales.

Oops.

Comparing XP to Me is absurd.

Alias
 
Thanks for the Sunday morning smile, "Not Me".

People with your background and experience - and there are many who post
here - are the ones that we neophytes should pay attention to concerning
operating systems and hardware.

Enjoyed your post.

mE

People
Not Me said:
I maintain and use ~200 machines with ME, W2K, XP and Linux.
Don't ask me about the AS-400/800s, I might go postal!
I have a couple of Vista machines at home (out of 14), but refuse to add
any to my LAN.
I have yet to see any compelling reason to do so.
People can say 'improved security' all year, but I don't see it.
All I see is annoyance to the users.
I was hoping MS would get it right with Vista, but I was sadly
disappointed throughout Beta and into RTM.
Even SP1 isn't much of an improvement.
MS didn't listen to my input, they knew what they wanted and pushed it out
as they wanted it...too bad they were looking in the rearview mirror
instead of out the windshield.
I advise people to suffer through it if they must get a new machine,
otherwise stick with what is currently working for them!
And yes, I have done many upgrades/repairs on XP machines, to extend their
life, instead of recommending new systems with this thing they call Vista
installed.
I can make Vista work, but WHY?
 
Sure there were few people who thought xp had problems...
but they were an insignificant minority. Back then when I came across a few
(yes ONLY a few) people that said that, I looked at them as if they were
aliens from another planet. They had no idea what they were talking about.
But vista is a totally different story.

with Vista the vast MAJORITY and BUSINESSES are avoiding vista like the
plague.

Its not anyone's fault for the bashing but Vista itself.

All MS had to do was make a VERY GOOD OS that most people in the world would
love.

It was within their capabilities but they blundered badly.

You cant expect all the world to just sit and take it from the rear... and
say, it hurts but I like it.







- Show quoted text -

Microsoft should just bite the bullet and port one of their OS's to
unix/linux. They will be criticized as copying Apple but it will
solve many problems. I had a Mac OS 10 Leopard system for 2 weeks in
January. I LOVED the Unix/linix/whatever OS under the covers. I just
could not get used to the menu bar system and everything on the left
of everything. The journal file systems were fantastic, but that is
a function of the Unix/Linux OS.

As much as I wanted to like it, it went back to Apple. One negative
aspect of owning a Mac is that just about every service/confoguration
question is packaged as a course at a Mac store for a fee.

I'm happy to stay with MS OS's.

Ed S.
 
The mac OS is based on BSD wich is basically a unix variation



Sure there were few people who thought xp had problems...
but they were an insignificant minority. Back then when I came across a
few
(yes ONLY a few) people that said that, I looked at them as if they were
aliens from another planet. They had no idea what they were talking about.
But vista is a totally different story.

with Vista the vast MAJORITY and BUSINESSES are avoiding vista like the
plague.

Its not anyone's fault for the bashing but Vista itself.

All MS had to do was make a VERY GOOD OS that most people in the world
would
love.

It was within their capabilities but they blundered badly.

You cant expect all the world to just sit and take it from the rear... and
say, it hurts but I like it.







- Show quoted text -

Microsoft should just bite the bullet and port one of their OS's to
unix/linux. They will be criticized as copying Apple but it will
solve many problems. I had a Mac OS 10 Leopard system for 2 weeks in
January. I LOVED the Unix/linix/whatever OS under the covers. I just
could not get used to the menu bar system and everything on the left
of everything. The journal file systems were fantastic, but that is
a function of the Unix/Linux OS.

As much as I wanted to like it, it went back to Apple. One negative
aspect of owning a Mac is that just about every service/confoguration
question is packaged as a course at a Mac store for a fee.

I'm happy to stay with MS OS's.

Ed S.
 
I am sick of this.

Everyone bashing Vista, go to Amazon.com and look at the user reviews of XP
in 2005. They are still there. One person opines that XP is worthless and
he is returning to reliable ME!!!!!

Yeah, they say things like

"Windows XP Professional is perhaps the best version of Windows that
Microsoft has released. It's rock-solid, well-supported, and easy to use."

"1. It's driver database is outstanding. I get so amazed when I plug in a
device and it automatically installs it.
2. I'm also impressed with the stability of this version. Remember the blue
screen that you always got in earlier versions?? It's basically gone!!"

Some people are just never happy.
 
I maintain and use ~200 machines with ME, W2K, XP and Linux.
Don't ask me about the AS-400/800s, I might go postal!
I have a couple of Vista machines at home (out of 14), but refuse to
add any to my LAN.
I have yet to see any compelling reason to do so.
People can say 'improved security' all year, but I don't see it.
All I see is annoyance to the users.
I was hoping MS would get it right with Vista, but I was sadly
disappointed throughout Beta and into RTM.
Even SP1 isn't much of an improvement.
MS didn't listen to my input, they knew what they wanted and pushed
it out as they wanted it...too bad they were looking in the rearview
mirror instead of out the windshield.
I advise people to suffer through it if they must get a new machine,
otherwise stick with what is currently working for them!
And yes, I have done many upgrades/repairs on XP machines, to extend
their life, instead of recommending new systems with this thing they
call Vista installed.
I can make Vista work, but WHY?

Holz said:
Read my reply above. A good OS is the one that works for you best.
Reading the posts in this NG presents a different case.

Amen to everything. Same business, sane numbers, look at my header for
the news reader.
 
Holz said:
You would hope that with so many talented people, so much money and
experience in releasing bad operating systems, Microsoft will finally
be able to make a first solid release.
VISTA was a huge disappointment to say the least. VISTA will be
replaced by Windows 7 (2010), Microsoft has completely revamped their OS
team to bring it out, which will use a
new memory model. Do you still think people are bashing it? It is simply a
bad, cheap
attempt to clone MAC OS, and by the way, Leopard is not much better.
Vista is incompatible with many things that are running on XP, which
was made by the same company, it has significant networking issues,
hardware issues, software issues, third party software issues. In
short, it did not live up to it's hype. Just read the post in this
forum..

This is a clueless response.
 
Could you structure the argument so that it is non contradictory? Perhaps
not....

Sure there were few people who thought xp had problems...
but they were an insignificant minority. Back then when I came across a
few
(yes ONLY a few) people that said that, I looked at them as if they were
aliens from another planet. They had no idea what they were talking about.
But vista is a totally different story.

with Vista the vast MAJORITY and BUSINESSES are avoiding vista like the
plague.

Its not anyone's fault for the bashing but Vista itself.

All MS had to do was make a VERY GOOD OS that most people in the world
would
love.

It was within their capabilities but they blundered badly.

You cant expect all the world to just sit and take it from the rear... and
say, it hurts but I like it.







- Show quoted text -

Microsoft should just bite the bullet and port one of their OS's to
unix/linux. They will be criticized as copying Apple but it will
solve many problems. I had a Mac OS 10 Leopard system for 2 weeks in
January. I LOVED the Unix/linix/whatever OS under the covers. I just
could not get used to the menu bar system and everything on the left
of everything. The journal file systems were fantastic, but that is
a function of the Unix/Linux OS.

As much as I wanted to like it, it went back to Apple. One negative
aspect of owning a Mac is that just about every service/confoguration
question is packaged as a course at a Mac store for a fee.

I'm happy to stay with MS OS's.

Ed S.
 
Telstar said:
Could you structure the argument so that it is non contradictory? Perhaps
not....

hehehe...we see this a lot...bashers shooting themselves in the
foot...then wondering why they're hobbled...then reloading...and trying
all over again.
Amazing!
Frank
 
Telstar said:
You need to understand the statistics of sampling from a population.


hehehe...you mean like using extrapolated information from
scientifically conducted, randomly sampled surveys to accurately project
(not predict) market trends?
Never happen, especially with so-called "engineers"...LOL!
Frank
 
Frank said:
hehehe...you mean like using extrapolated information from
scientifically conducted, randomly sampled surveys to accurately project
(not predict) market trends?
Never happen, especially with so-called "engineers"...LOL!
Frank

Haven't forgotten how to copy and paste Francis. Good boy.

Cheers.

--
What does Bill Gates use?
http://tinyurl.com/2zxhdl

Proprietary Software: a 20th Century software business model.

Q: What OS is built for lusers?
A: Which one requires running lusermgr.msc to create them?

Frank, hard at work on his Vista computer all day:
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/compost.htm
 
Back
Top