P
Paul Mckenna
Hi,
OK, so my views.. I really like Vista, Sure i had to upgrade my PC's soooooo
much to get it to work well, but it worked and the office 2007, amazing!,
not once have I spent hours arguing with customers about why things that
worked amazingly well in office 97 no longer work or having to explain the
layout change... It really make's my life so much easier.. God bless
Microsoft.. but after installing SP1 on my notebook I get numerous Visual C
errors..
I do however notice like 1000% performance gain in copy files over the
network..
Cause I was bored, I installed Windows 3.1 on a virtual machine (VMWARE)..
And OH MY GOD! i think we've forgotten... On new hardware it loaded
instantly.. It takes you longer to double click than it does to load the
programs.. I'm starting to wonder if I should suggest DOS and Windows 3.1 to
customers because it performs amazingly on current hardware.. Where as Vista
not so much!
OK, so my views.. I really like Vista, Sure i had to upgrade my PC's soooooo
much to get it to work well, but it worked and the office 2007, amazing!,
not once have I spent hours arguing with customers about why things that
worked amazingly well in office 97 no longer work or having to explain the
layout change... It really make's my life so much easier.. God bless
Microsoft.. but after installing SP1 on my notebook I get numerous Visual C
errors..
I do however notice like 1000% performance gain in copy files over the
network..
Cause I was bored, I installed Windows 3.1 on a virtual machine (VMWARE)..
And OH MY GOD! i think we've forgotten... On new hardware it loaded
instantly.. It takes you longer to double click than it does to load the
programs.. I'm starting to wonder if I should suggest DOS and Windows 3.1 to
customers because it performs amazingly on current hardware.. Where as Vista
not so much!