H
Hank Scorpio
I've downloaded the Sequential Save add-in from
http://www.mvps.org/skp/seqsave.htm
It's a useful tool, but I've come across one problem; whenever I try
to set the options, the following error appears:
--------------------
Run-Time Error 26001
Failed to delete registry key: -2147483647', Section: Software\Shyam
Pillai\Sequential Save\', Key: Subfolder name
------------------
The error still appears even if I go into RegEdit and create that key
prior to trying to set the options. It also appears whether I've made
any changes to the options, or am just selecting [OK] for the default
ones.
This is happening on four separate machines, two running Windows XP
Pro, one XP Home, and one Windows 98. It seems to be such a widely
used add-in that I was surprised that I didn't find anything in a
Google search about this, but on the other hand the file that I
downloaded was dated only 28-MAY-04 so it could be something relating
to a recent change.
I've e-mailed a copy of this post to Shyam, but on the not
unreasonable assumption that he has a life away from his computer and
may therefore not see it for a while I thought I'd ask the Group
whether they've encountered this problem and /or found a workaround.
Thanks.
http://www.mvps.org/skp/seqsave.htm
It's a useful tool, but I've come across one problem; whenever I try
to set the options, the following error appears:
--------------------
Run-Time Error 26001
Failed to delete registry key: -2147483647', Section: Software\Shyam
Pillai\Sequential Save\', Key: Subfolder name
------------------
The error still appears even if I go into RegEdit and create that key
prior to trying to set the options. It also appears whether I've made
any changes to the options, or am just selecting [OK] for the default
ones.
This is happening on four separate machines, two running Windows XP
Pro, one XP Home, and one Windows 98. It seems to be such a widely
used add-in that I was surprised that I didn't find anything in a
Google search about this, but on the other hand the file that I
downloaded was dated only 28-MAY-04 so it could be something relating
to a recent change.
I've e-mailed a copy of this post to Shyam, but on the not
unreasonable assumption that he has a life away from his computer and
may therefore not see it for a while I thought I'd ask the Group
whether they've encountered this problem and /or found a workaround.
Thanks.