F
Fuzzy Logic
Looks interesting and apparently does a lot. I would be curious to hear from
people who have tried it.
http://www.secretmaker.com/
people who have tried it.
http://www.secretmaker.com/
A
Alastair Smeaton
Who should use our freeware software package?
All-in-One SECRETMAKER is designed for users who wish to:
? Keep their email box free of spam
? Avoid irritating pop-up and banner interruptions
? Protect their privacy and avoids profiling
? Use the Internet efficiently for private or business use
the site looks very dodgy to me - couldn't easily see a license, and
the about page is all about how to invest in the company.
I may be wrong, and this may be the wrong phrase to use in acf , but
caveat emptor
F
Fuzzy Logic
Who should use our freeware software package?
All-in-One SECRETMAKER is designed for users who wish to:
? Keep their email box free of spam
? Avoid irritating pop-up and banner interruptions
? Protect their privacy and avoids profiling
? Use the Internet efficiently for private or business use
the site looks very dodgy to me - couldn't easily see a license, and
the about page is all about how to invest in the company.
I may be wrong, and this may be the wrong phrase to use in acf , but
caveat emptor
Good programmers are not necessarily good web designers!
A
Alastair Smeaton
I was commenting on the content, rather than design.
that's why I said " the site looks very dodgy to me - couldn't easily
see a license, and the about page is all about how to invest in the
company."
I did not criticise it's use of frames, colour schemes or whatever -
just the lack of an obvious licence.
Is that better ?
F
Fuzzy Logic
Again I was wondering if anyone actually tried the software?! I am not
interested in wether or not they have a good web site or the license is easy
to find. It says Freeware all over the site. It looks like an interesting
package and I was curious to know if anyone had tried it and what they
thought of it.
J
John Corliss
Fuzzy said:
This might be easy to fake, but you might want to look at the CNET
user reviews for the program:
http://www.download.com/3302-2382_4-10300840.html
R
R. L.
I don't often visit Cnet myself anymore now. Yet, I remember
whenever I read the reviews, I tended to choose the negative
review to read so that I would have a picture of how bad a
program could potientially get - You know, if it is good, you
don't really *have to* know about it if you have already
decided to give it a try, but if it is bad, you'd better know
what is coming and what it could do to your box.
While the good reviews sound pretty good, I read the few
negative reviews on that download page for Secretmaker (but of
course, it may totally unreliable)
(http://www.download.com/3302-2382_4-10300840.html?pn=2&fb=2),
My conclusion is that if I am going to try it I will make sure
I install it with TotalUninstal
(http://www.geocities.com/ggmartau/)
or BB Testrun (http://dogkennels.gq.nu/testrun/) just in case,
as it sounds like it could cause some bad things in certain
systems and perhaps (really ONLY perhaps has spyware, but I am
not sure). It is always a good idea to monitor the
installation process for something you are not entirely sure
about.
BTW, some negative reviews report blue screencrash with XP, I
am thinking to myself that "this can't be good", because I
have been using XP for a while and never once seen a blue
screen. Whatever causing it with that program, it could be a
pretty big stability issue that a program needs to deal with -
just my 2cents.
Finally, the screenshot looks pretty nice and I'd really
consider trying it out if I hadn't switched to Firefox and
have a really good spam filter myself: I use K9 + Hamster +
Pimmy, 99.99999999999999999 spam free
--
RL
Unofficial Adaware Updater (+other goodies)
http://home.earthlink.net/~ringomei/page2.html
********************************
Pricelessware voting annual results and information:
http://www.pricelessware.org,
http://www.pricelesswarehome.org,
http://www.earths-ocular.com/mirror/www.pricelesswarehome.org/