Scavenged Nodes vs Records

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rick
  • Start date Start date
R

Rick

below is a log entry from our DNS Scavenging, what is the difference
between a node and a record?

Rick.



Event Type: Information
Event Source: DNS
Event Category: None
Event ID: 2501
Date: 5/21/2007
Time: 4:44:09 PM
User: N/A
Computer: ISMSD02
Description:
The DNS server has completed a scavenging cycle:
Visited Zones = 53,
Visited Nodes = 3485,
Scavenged Nodes = 412,
Scavenged Records = 553.

This cycle took 1 seconds.

The next scavenging cycle is scheduled to run in 24 hours.

The event data will contain the error code if there was an error
during the scavenging cycle.

For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
 
Read inline please.

In
Rick said:
below is a log entry from our DNS Scavenging, what is the difference
between a node and a record?
Click to expand...

A record exists on a node, but nodes can have multiple records on it. Some
record types can not exist on a node with other record types. For example,
you can only have one CNAME on a node, and you cannot have a CNAME on the
same node with an A or MX record. But you can have multiple A and MX records
on a single node.

Event Type: Information
Event Source: DNS
Event Category: None
Event ID: 2501
Date: 5/21/2007
Time: 4:44:09 PM
User: N/A
Computer: ISMSD02
Description:
The DNS server has completed a scavenging cycle:
Visited Zones = 53,
Visited Nodes = 3485,
Scavenged Nodes = 412,
Scavenged Records = 553.

This cycle took 1 seconds.

The next scavenging cycle is scheduled to run in 24 hours.

The event data will contain the error code if there was an error
during the scavenging cycle.

For more information, see Help and Support Center at
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Click to expand...



--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps

===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================
http://www.lonestaramerica.com/
http://support.wftx.us/
http://message.wftx.us/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and more
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:
http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================
 
Read inline please.

In

A record exists on a node, but nodes can have multiple records on it. Some
record types can not exist on a node with other record types. For example,
you can only have one CNAME on a node, and you cannot have a CNAME on the
same node with an A or MX record. But you can have multiple A and MX records
on a single node.










--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps

===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================http://www.lonestaramerica.com/http://support.wftx.us/http://message.wftx.us/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and morehttp://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Click to expand...

Kevin,
thank you for the followup on my issue,

Rick
 
Read inline please.

In

A record exists on a node, but nodes can have multiple records on it. Some
record types can not exist on a node with other record types. For example,
you can only have one CNAME on a node, and you cannot have a CNAME on the
same node with an A or MX record. But you can have multiple A and MX records
on a single node.










--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps

===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================http://www.lonestaramerica.com/http://support.wftx.us/http://message.wftx.us/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and morehttp://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Click to expand...
Kevin, I found this explanation elsewhere on google,

according to this my records should be equal to or greater then my
nodes. is this correct. I have another log entry that shows the
following

Event Type: Information
Event Source: DNS
Event Category: None
Event ID: 2501
Date: 5/28/2007
Time: 4:50:12 PM
User: N/A
Computer: ISMSD02
Description:
The DNS server has completed a scavenging cycle:
Visited Zones = 54,
Visited Nodes = 6242,
Scavenged Nodes = 74,
Scavenged Records = 21.

is this saying there is not a record for every node? there were 74
Scavenged Nodes, but only 21 Scavenged Records.

Rick.



Visited Nodes = 3485,
A DNS node is equivalent to a DNS name. This is the number of DNS
names
that were examined during the scavenging pass.

Scavenged Nodes = 412,
This is the number of DNS names that had records deleted during the
scavenging
pass.

Scavenged Records = 553.
This is the number of DNS records deleted during the scavenging pass.
This
number is higher than "scavenged nodes" because multiple records were
deleted at some names.
 
Read inline please.

In
Rick said:
Kevin, I found this explanation elsewhere on google,

according to this my records should be equal to or greater then my
nodes. is this correct. I have another log entry that shows the
following

Event Type: Information
Event Source: DNS
Event Category: None
Event ID: 2501
Date: 5/28/2007
Time: 4:50:12 PM
User: N/A
Computer: ISMSD02
Description:
The DNS server has completed a scavenging cycle:
Visited Zones = 54,
Visited Nodes = 6242,
Scavenged Nodes = 74,
Scavenged Records = 21.

is this saying there is not a record for every node? there were 74
Scavenged Nodes, but only 21 Scavenged Records.
Click to expand...

That would seem to be what it is saying, which doesn't sound right, It would
seem to say you had nodes without records. Could it be that you had sub
domains without records in them?

Visited Nodes = 3485,
A DNS node is equivalent to a DNS name. This is the number of DNS
names
that were examined during the scavenging pass.

Scavenged Nodes = 412,
This is the number of DNS names that had records deleted during the
scavenging
pass.

Scavenged Records = 553.
This is the number of DNS records deleted during the scavenging pass.
This
number is higher than "scavenged nodes" because multiple records were
deleted at some names.
Click to expand...

This would be more in the ball park with 553 records scavenged on 412 nodes.

--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps

===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================
http://www.lonestaramerica.com/
http://support.wftx.us/
http://message.wftx.us/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and more
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:
http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================
 
Read inline please.

InRick <[email protected]> typed:









That would seem to be what it is saying, which doesn't sound right, It would
seem to say you had nodes without records. Could it be that you had sub
domains without records in them?










This would be more in the ball park with 553 records scavenged on 412 nodes.

--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps

===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================http://www.lonestaramerica.com/http://support.wftx.us/http://message.wftx.us/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and morehttp://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Click to expand...

thanks again for the reply

Rick
 
Back
Top