Should I have him shoot it in the scanners, natural/optical resolution,
and I just take it from there?
So Photoshop it is for the scanning calculations, however, for those
not fortunate enough to have Adobe, what Paul has posted needs some
comment. Although other sources agree, "Scanning an image for the
screen is the same as scanning one for printing except the output is
usually specified in pixels, not inches." Scanning an Image for
Screen Display at
http://www.shortcourses.com/pixels/scanning.htm also
say's "images are usually scanned at 72pp for screen display."
This is simply not true and flies in the face of what we learn from
Wayne Fulton's visual examples at the web site posted by CSM1.
Shortcourses also says the screen's resolution is on average 72 dpi.
This appears to be pure bull. You do not measure pixels in inches. I
am sorry but it looks like this writer has a problem explaining what
he, thinks he means.
1 Enter the width in inches of the image to be scanned.
2 Enter the depth or height of the image to be scanned.
3 Enter the screen's resolution in dots per inch (dpi). This is
normally 72 dpi on average.
4 Enter the desired width of the image in pixels.
5 The vertical size of the image is calculated by dividing its width on
line 4, by the ratio of the original's width to height; calculate by
dividing line 1 by line 2.
Does this make any sense to you?
www.scantips.com/no72dpi.html site is very informative, but it does
NOT have a calculation from inches to pixels, which was the question.
Fulton's calculator would be much more useful if you could pose
questions for any missing variable, and not just linearly. All you can
do with that thing is to print. I do not want to print. The question
involves the natural flow of the universe. Moving from hard to soft,
yang to yin, print (inches) to screen (pixels.) In essence moving from
the past into the future.