I have been experimenting using Vuescan, GIMP and my new Minolta 5400 on
my Linux system before I begin to scan in 50 years worth of slides and
negatives. I think I have Vuescan pretty much figured out except for
controlling the final image size.
I have 3 slides that I scanned at full (5400) resolution and I want to
splice the three scans into one image
using GIMP. When I scan each slide I set the size to 8x10 inches in
Vuescan and scan at 5400. When I pull one of the three scanned
images into GIMP the image size > 200 inches. Wow! I certaintly don't
want something that's 600 inches big when I splice the 3 images together.
Why?
What am I missing?
What I am shooting for is to splice the 3 images so it will fit on
a 8x10 or 11x14 photo paper.
How do I do this?
There are many basics involved here, way too much for one little usenet
message. But the very first thing to know is that digital images are
dimensioned in pixels, not in inches. Inches exist only on the printed
paper. And inches exist on the scanned 35 mm film. Inches exist on things
you can hold in your hand. But the digital image is dimensioned only in
pixels.
See the VueScan UserGuide (at Help menu) about the Output tab subject,
where it says:
Printed size
Use this option to select the target size of the saved images. This is used
to compute the resolution of the saved TIFF and JPEG files. The dpi of the
saved files will depend on the dpi produced by the scanner and the image
size.
Note that "Printed size" does not affect the number of pixels in the image,
so this setting does not affect the file size. "Image size" controls
logically how far apart the pixels should be displayed in order to fit in
the bounds specified. This also means that "Printed size" does not cause
VueScan to resample the image.
----------
So it doesnt matter what you specify there for printed size, you will still
get the same image size in pixels. Printed dpi only specifies some future
spacing on paper (of those pixels). When you specify 5400 dpi, it is
going to scan at 5400 dpi. From 35 mm film (full frame is roughly about
1.4x0.9 inches) then 5400 dpi will create:
(1.4 inches x 5400 dpi) x (0.9 inches x 5400 dpi) = 7560x4860 pixels.
Assuming 24 bit color, this is over 100 MB, a gigantic image. When you
print it at say 300 dpi, that meaning is that you space THESE pixels on
paper at 300 pixels per inch, so 7560x4860 pixels will print about 25x16
inches (one of them). Because 7560 pixels / 300 dpi = 25 inches. That is
how far they go when spaced at 300 per inch. This huge size seems
excessive for your goal of 1/3 of 8x10. You have too many pixels, meaning
you used excessive scan resolution, for this goal.
I cant get any 200 inch number in this case... Even the 7560 pixels spaced
over 200 inches is 7560 pixels / 200 inches = 37 dpi. I cant imagine what
might have happened to show that 37 dpi. Something else happened.
If your goal is to print 3 of these on 8x10, then one choice is that each
one should be about 8 x 3.333 inches (1/3 of 8x10). This is much smaller
than 26x16 inches, so you need much less than 5400 dpi (to create an
appropriate number of pixels, to space over 8x10 inches at 300 dpi).
If your goal is 8x10 inches at 300 dpi on paper, then THAT total overall
goal is 2400x3000 pixels (8x300 and 10x300). If that is three images, then
perhaps each one is 1/3 of that, or 2400x1000 pixels.
Scanning at 1350 dpi (1/4 of 5400) is probably not enough, because 1350 dpi
x 1.4 inches = 1890 pixels, which is not the 2400 pixels needed to fill 8
inches at 300 dpi. I am not sure of your orientation situation, but try
scanning at 5400/3 or 5400/2 dpi instead.
This 1/3 shape (the 2.4 to 1 shape) is very wide and short, not the same as
the shape of 35 mm film, which is 3:2 aspect ratio (a bit closer to
square), so some considerable croppig will be necessary. I suspect that
wont be easy, because the middle picture cant be cropped in one
direction... depends on the overlap, etc... It will surely best to work
with a little larger image (perhaps like up to 2x larger) than needed, to
be able to get it combined right, and then resample the result to smaller
desired size (the 2400x3000 pixels for 8x10 at 300 dpi).
The bottom status bar of VueScan shows all of these numbers before the
scan. You need to learn to think in terms of pixels. Scanning creates
pixels. Digital images are dimensioned in pixels. Pixels is all there is.
Then later you decide how to space those pixels on paper (by printing
spaced at 300 dpi). You can print any image at any size in inches (by
printing at any dpi on paper), but printing at around 300 dpi is most
appropriate, normally will come out best. So it is good to think ahead,
and plan how many pixels you need to create to be right for that future
printing job.
The site below may help with understanding the basics of scanning.
Hope it helps.