I'm on the way to replace my (very) old Scanjet IIc for a new one
( Fourteen years and still working, but slow, only 400 dpi and forgotten by
software vendors )
That's plenty good enough for documents and photo prints.
I'm looking for something inexpensive mainly for documents and some 35mm
slides/negatives.
Right now my choice would be either a Canonscan 4200F or an Epson Perfection
3490
Price is similar as is resolution. 3200x6400 dpi.
Anyone with experience on those units or something on this price segment ?
Thanks in advance and HAPPY NEW YEAR to everybody
There are few times if ever, you will need that kind of resolution in
a flat bed.
Several do come with film and slide adapters, but none that I know of
come any where near that of a dedicated film scanner and most that are
passable are considered acceptable for incidental work only.
They are getting better, but I don't think any would be considered
much good for scanning slides and negatives to make anything larger
than standard size prints, or maybe for a computer screen display.
I have a scanjet 5470 that does a very good job on documents and
prints. To top it off, the thing is *fast*. It'll take prints faster
than I can feed them. It does have a film and negative adapter with
its own light source. (If you do get one for the ability to scan
negatives and slides get one that has a separate light source for
that). As I do a lot of negative and slide work I have a dedicated
scanner for that (LS5000ED)
Read the reviews of the flatbeds from the sites that do reviews.
Beware the ones written by those with their first scanner who think a
scanner produces fantastic 4 X 6 images from a 35mm negative or slide.
However if that is all you want then don't worry about it. <
)
I would suggest staying away from scanners powered via USB, Both
scanners here are USB but have their own power supplies. Depending on
the scanner it can add a lot of load to the computer power supply.
One word of caution; Once you start scanning try not to use more
resolution than you really need.
As a comparison, a dedicated film scanner at 4000 to 5000 dpi will
scan right down into the grain on a 35mm negative or slide. The only
thing the 6400 dpi is going to give is a larger file and they are
already *big*. A 35 mm negative at 4000 dpi and 8 bit color depth
creates a file in the 60 megabyte range. At 16 bit color depth it is
on the order of 128 megs. That means a CD can only hold 6 of those
images or less. At 6400 dpi those files are going to be *huge*.
A 4 X 6 print is going to be about 300 dpi so it'll be 1200 X 1800
full size. Scanning a 35mm image at 1200 dpi in a good scanner should
be sufficient.
I bring this up as you are specifically looking in the lower price
segment of the market. Scanning at this resolution means a lot of
CDs, DVDs or Hard Drive space. That storage space can quickly cost
more than the scanner.
Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com