D
drocillo
Hi there,
Can you please help me to keep my sanity ? Recently I made a foray into
the world of digital photography by buying my first digital camera
Kodak of a lower specification during Xmas sale. At Xmas sale, I also
bought a Japan-made Toshiba SD card (256MB capacity) for only AU$50
(US$38). I liked the feeling when I was holding this neatly-made
quality card. The specifications which I found on the Internet said
this card had a read/write speed of 7MBps/2MBps. I also liked that the
marking was practically painted on the card and not made of an
easily-wearable paper sticker.
I decided it was not right for me and I turned the card back to the
retailer. I wanted something of a brand name but cheaper which would
be in line with the cheaper camera. I had a look at a rebadged Toshiba
card made in Taiwan and did not like its coarse look. Finally, I
discovered that the China-made Sandisk Standard SD card (256MB) looked
rather neat, and all of my colleagues seemed to have the card of this
brand name and were happy with it. So I bought it on special for AU$42
(US$32).
The camera writes to/reads from the Sandisk card (serial number
AR0534304059B) at the same speed as did with Toshiba card (because the
reading/writing speed is limited by the camera itself). The card-to-PC
transfer is capped at 1.5MB/s which is obviously the speed of the
inbuilt SD reader. However, the feeling of committing a worse deal does
not leave me for several days already. The Internet search turned up
that the Sandisk cards generally were considered as slow and had a
read/write speed of up to 2MBps/1MBps correspondingly. My coarse
measurement showed that the read/write speed was 1.5MBps/1.3MBps (the
read speed was probably limited by the inbuilt PC reader and might in
reality be slightly more... say, 2MB/s). This is peanuts for the modern
cards ! The card of such a speed would be unsuitable for a better-spec
digital camera or for a hand-held PC... however I reasoned that when in
few years I am going to buy any of them, the price for memory cards
will drop and the better cameras/hand-helds/cards will released to the
market.
Nevertheless, as I said, I feel that I did a worse deal. I searched the
Internet to see what advantages the Sandisk cards had over Toshibas,
and found out that Sandisks are reputed for their reliability... so are
the Toshibas. More of the search turned up that it was the Panasonic
brand which had the best reputation for speed because they had the best
access times because of the controller design. I even learnt that the
larger-capacity Standard SD Cards from Sandisk (512MB and above) had a
significantly higher read/write speed (than the 256-MB cards). For
example, their read speed of 7MB/s was somewhat close to the Sandisk
Ultra II which had a read speed of 10MB/s.
So, can anyone tell me why it is good to have a Sandisk SD card and why
it is better than Toshiba ?
Thanks a million in advance.
Regards,
D.
Can you please help me to keep my sanity ? Recently I made a foray into
the world of digital photography by buying my first digital camera
Kodak of a lower specification during Xmas sale. At Xmas sale, I also
bought a Japan-made Toshiba SD card (256MB capacity) for only AU$50
(US$38). I liked the feeling when I was holding this neatly-made
quality card. The specifications which I found on the Internet said
this card had a read/write speed of 7MBps/2MBps. I also liked that the
marking was practically painted on the card and not made of an
easily-wearable paper sticker.
I decided it was not right for me and I turned the card back to the
retailer. I wanted something of a brand name but cheaper which would
be in line with the cheaper camera. I had a look at a rebadged Toshiba
card made in Taiwan and did not like its coarse look. Finally, I
discovered that the China-made Sandisk Standard SD card (256MB) looked
rather neat, and all of my colleagues seemed to have the card of this
brand name and were happy with it. So I bought it on special for AU$42
(US$32).
The camera writes to/reads from the Sandisk card (serial number
AR0534304059B) at the same speed as did with Toshiba card (because the
reading/writing speed is limited by the camera itself). The card-to-PC
transfer is capped at 1.5MB/s which is obviously the speed of the
inbuilt SD reader. However, the feeling of committing a worse deal does
not leave me for several days already. The Internet search turned up
that the Sandisk cards generally were considered as slow and had a
read/write speed of up to 2MBps/1MBps correspondingly. My coarse
measurement showed that the read/write speed was 1.5MBps/1.3MBps (the
read speed was probably limited by the inbuilt PC reader and might in
reality be slightly more... say, 2MB/s). This is peanuts for the modern
cards ! The card of such a speed would be unsuitable for a better-spec
digital camera or for a hand-held PC... however I reasoned that when in
few years I am going to buy any of them, the price for memory cards
will drop and the better cameras/hand-helds/cards will released to the
market.
Nevertheless, as I said, I feel that I did a worse deal. I searched the
Internet to see what advantages the Sandisk cards had over Toshibas,
and found out that Sandisks are reputed for their reliability... so are
the Toshibas. More of the search turned up that it was the Panasonic
brand which had the best reputation for speed because they had the best
access times because of the controller design. I even learnt that the
larger-capacity Standard SD Cards from Sandisk (512MB and above) had a
significantly higher read/write speed (than the 256-MB cards). For
example, their read speed of 7MB/s was somewhat close to the Sandisk
Ultra II which had a read speed of 10MB/s.
So, can anyone tell me why it is good to have a Sandisk SD card and why
it is better than Toshiba ?
Thanks a million in advance.
Regards,
D.