SandCastle x NDoc 2.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

Folks,
Is anyone stuck like me, in choosing between SandCastle (the new MS doc
support) and NDoc 2.0 framework?
Ive downloaded NDoc 2.0 but it does not compile quite well. On the other
hand, SandCastle seems to be too childish to use it for real in professional
app...

Any opinions?
 
Bruce One said:
Is anyone stuck like me, in choosing between SandCastle (the new MS doc
support) and NDoc 2.0 framework?
Ive downloaded NDoc 2.0 but it does not compile quite well. On the other
hand, SandCastle seems to be too childish to use it for real in
professional
app...
Click to expand...

I would say wait a little longer for SandCastle. They claim that it is the
tool MS used to generate all of the FCL documentation, so I think it is not
so childish...

<QUOTE>
During VS 2005 ship cycle we wrote Sandcastle to ship .NET Framework
documentation for MSDN online and offline libraries.
</QUOTE>

Here is their blog.

http://blogs.msdn.com/sandcastle/

NDoc is dead.

-- Alan
 
Bruce said:
Folks,
Is anyone stuck like me, in choosing between SandCastle (the new MS
doc support) and NDoc 2.0 framework?
Ive downloaded NDoc 2.0 but it does not compile quite well. On the
other hand, SandCastle seems to be too childish to use it for real in
professional app...

Any opinions?
Click to expand...

If you have to deliver NOW, and sandcastle doesn't cut it, go for a
commercial offering. The least saddest solution I could find (which
also has some weird bugs, but at least it seems to produce a document
in most cases) is documentx 5.

If you can wait a little longer, wait for sandcastle and a gui
frontend.

FB

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead developer of LLBLGen Pro, the productive O/R mapper for .NET
LLBLGen Pro website: http://www.llblgen.com
My .NET blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma
Microsoft MVP (C#)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Back
Top