M
Mickey Segal
I ran Disk Defragmenter earlier today and it took 7 hours (on a 2.66 GHz
computer with a 80 GB hard drive). I re-booted and ran it again, and it has
been running for an hour. On Windows XP, Disk Defragmenter would run for
very little time on the second run with the same computer. Is some extra
service being provided here, such as moving around files to keep the bits
from decaying? Or is it just inefficient?
I agree with others that not having displays of progress is a bother - if
some people found the display burdensome it could be off by default.
computer with a 80 GB hard drive). I re-booted and ran it again, and it has
been running for an hour. On Windows XP, Disk Defragmenter would run for
very little time on the second run with the same computer. Is some extra
service being provided here, such as moving around files to keep the bits
from decaying? Or is it just inefficient?
I agree with others that not having displays of progress is a bother - if
some people found the display burdensome it could be off by default.