Ed said:
IOW if AMD has seen any noticeable decrease in sales (not counting Xmas
sales)? The Barton 2500+ had to be seeling like hot cakes, seemed like
everybody was buying them.
The unlocked CPU was the thing that pushed me over the edge back in May,
I just couldn't resist. I was running a locked Palomino 2000+ at the
time as my main PC and was never brave enough to butcher the bridges to
unlock it, the Barton was just too easy, Plug n Play!
Who knows, maybe some smart kid will figure out a way around the locked
chips yet? It wouldn't surprise me if someone did.
Cheers,
Ed
Yes its a shame they pissed on our camp fire. Before my Barton 3200+, I had
a $79 XP2100+ tbred that (ironically) I suspect was a faster CPU. I used to
run the old tbred at around 2400 ~ 2450 MHz with a 228MHz FSB. The new
Barton (at least I got it cheap) will do around the same speed (2420 MHz),
but of course since its locked I can't get the FSB higher than 220.
So I gain a bit on the cache and lose on the FSB.
I was hoping the Barton would go a bit higher, since I bought a genuine
3200+. Had I known how it performs, and that it was locked, I wouldn't have
bothered.
I can't really see how this makes sense for AMD. Anyone who *know* about
multipliers and FSB's just isn't going to buy a new locked CPU, if they have
an old unlocked one that will do the same speed anyway.
And anyone who doesn't know about multiplier and fsb's etc wouldn't know
whether the CPU they bought was locked or not!!! So to them its irrelevant.
The only thing AMD are doing is stopping people with (say) 1700's from
changing to 2500 Bartons. A small dent in sales for AMD. And a big dent in
customer relations. Bad move.
Chip.