L
LL
Hello,
We have W2K domain, DC with DNS and RRAS server has static IP address
192.168.1.90. All other pc's in our network are DHCP clients. Linksys
router works as DHCP server with starting IP address 192.168.1.100.
I use static address pool for VPN clients - let it be
192.168.1.20-192.168.1.30, so internal VPN interface got address
192.168.1.20.
All our VPN clients can connect successfully, can see all computers in
Network Place or Network Neighborhood (depends of clients OS). The problem
is :
clients have access to share resource on RRAS server, but all attempt to get
access to all other computers in the network are ended with message "The
network path is not found" or "You don't have right..." or something about
network error. We resolved this problem for Windows 98 clients by adding
them gateway for 192.168.1.20 (VPN interface). It works perfect, all network
is fully accessible for them, but I would like to ask you, gurus: what wrong
in this VPN configuration, is it better to use static pool for VPN clients
or dynamic pool and why? And another question is about XP clients: I
didn't find the way to add gateway, so should I add entry to routing table
to fix this problem?
Thank you very much for all reply.
L.
We have W2K domain, DC with DNS and RRAS server has static IP address
192.168.1.90. All other pc's in our network are DHCP clients. Linksys
router works as DHCP server with starting IP address 192.168.1.100.
I use static address pool for VPN clients - let it be
192.168.1.20-192.168.1.30, so internal VPN interface got address
192.168.1.20.
All our VPN clients can connect successfully, can see all computers in
Network Place or Network Neighborhood (depends of clients OS). The problem
is :
clients have access to share resource on RRAS server, but all attempt to get
access to all other computers in the network are ended with message "The
network path is not found" or "You don't have right..." or something about
network error. We resolved this problem for Windows 98 clients by adding
them gateway for 192.168.1.20 (VPN interface). It works perfect, all network
is fully accessible for them, but I would like to ask you, gurus: what wrong
in this VPN configuration, is it better to use static pool for VPN clients
or dynamic pool and why? And another question is about XP clients: I
didn't find the way to add gateway, so should I add entry to routing table
to fix this problem?
Thank you very much for all reply.
L.