A
anonymous
Noticed samsung is bringing back 5400 drives. Four 160G drives would
look nice on a promise SX card.
look nice on a promise SX card.
Noticed samsung is bringing back 5400 drives. Four 160G drives would
look nice on a promise SX card.
anonymous said:Noticed samsung is bringing back 5400 drives. Four 160G drives would
look nice on a promise SX card.
Ron said:What on earth for. The average access time is dismal.
What on earth for. The average access time is dismal.
anonymous said:glad you asked.
guess what ?
I don't care about average access time.
guess what I do care about ?
Working around the lousy products the manufacturers' sell because
people like you think fast and flakey is great.
Alexander said:A friend of mine, who's reselling computer parts, says Samsung drives give
him _very_few_ returns. They seem to become very reliable now. I think,
those new 5400 rpm drives will go to the set-top TV boxes and recorders.
That sounds like nice knee-jerk consumerism but it's crap.
nonsense.
J. Clarke said:I advise taking any information from "a friend of mine, who's reselling
computer parts" with a very, very large dose of salt.
Wotanidiot.
If you search the
archives for this newsgroup with keywords "friend of mine" (include the
quotes) you'll find vast numbers of posts with such a source, and one guy's
friend often says that he has no problems while another guy's friend says
the same drive is nothing but trouble.
Wotanidiot.
I agree that Samsung seems to have their QC problems licked, but they're
still the new kid on the block and their high end is at the same
performance level as every other vendor's mid-to-low end.
If one is trying for high reliability they wouldn't be the first choice.
I've had a couple of their 120s running in my Tivo
for over a year and so far they're behaving fine.
They show a "Spinpoint V80" series, of which the 5400 RPM 160 GB drive is a
member, and a "Spinpoing V80 CE" series, which seems to have the same specs
but which they say is targetted at consumer electronics.
Not sure what the difference is, maybe different optimization in the firmware?