Susan Bugher said:
You've been busy. I downloaded everything - took a *quick* look last
night - nice

- more comments when I've spent more time - I did see
some things *I* need to do. . .
Couple hours after posting the message on the upload, found a central
problem. The index.html for the 2004 arch, I"d had it pointing to
non-existent files. So fixed, and re-uploaded. Only now have I done what
I should have done long before uploading. Have Xenu check things out.
When Httrack retrieved files, it had given me, for the 2004 archive, a number
of file pairs: something01.htm, and something01.html. I took a quick look,
saw a pattern where the two files were either roughly the same, or, more
often, the .htm of the pair, it was missing the headers and footers. I
interpreted it as a script burp, that the generated .htms in those pairs
were not intended for the actual end-user browse. So deleted them. Not
thoroughly researching until now the internal filename referencing. IOW,
I was lazily riding the "assume" car in a big way.
What would be easiest for me to do at this stage, it's to give every file
in the 2004 archive an html extension, then do an SR of .htm for html. After
that, I'll have another conversation with Xenu.
Sorry to have uploaded so prematurely. It's kind of like posting: it's only
after the post has been sent, made public, that errors become visible.