Remoting between 2.0 and 1.1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hugo Vale
  • Start date Start date
H

Hugo Vale

Hi everybody,

I have a 3rd party 1.1 framework dll that I want to use in a .net 2.0
application. Alvin Bruney already told me here that I can't use it as a
reference in my 2.0 app because it will be run in 2.0. So, I'm wondering if
it's possible to make a little 1.1 app that will reference that dll and then
it will communicate with my 2.0 app using remoting. Will that work?
 
Hugo said:
Hi everybody,

I have a 3rd party 1.1 framework dll that I want to use in a .net 2.0
application. Alvin Bruney already told me here that I can't use it as a
reference in my 2.0 app because it will be run in 2.0. So, I'm wondering if
it's possible to make a little 1.1 app that will reference that dll and then
it will communicate with my 2.0 app using remoting. Will that work?
Click to expand...

I don't think so. My experience so far is that SERIALIZATION has
changed, and as such prevents remoting between 1.1 and 2.0.

I have called 1.1 components from 2.0. It worked for me in a limited
use. Even if it did not for you, then how about providing a COM wrapper
on your 3rd party, and calling that from your 2.0 code, as an isolation
layer. I know it is perverse, and will probably be doggy, but maybe it
will help get you through a tough spot temporarily.
 
Thanks for the info Gillie,

At this point I'm ready to try anything. The only thing is, that I don't
even know where to start with that COM wrapper, do you know any good
articles on the web where I can look at?

Thanks in advance
 
Believe it or not the documentation has some great information.

Also, to learn, make a new project, choose class library as the type.
ADD NEW ITEM to the class. Choose "COM CLASS". You will notice there are
simply a few project settings made, and a little extra code added to the
class.

HTH - Lee
 
Hi Lee,

I've tried doing a COM class to wrap that 3rd party dll. It all went fine
until I referenced it on my 2.0 project. When I do that, it tells me that it
is a .net com class and I must use the dll directly instead of the COM
wrapper, if I do that it treats it like a regular .net dll and running it in
2.0 I've tried not referencing it and use the
CreateObject("MyWrapper.ComWrapper") but it still treats it as being .net.
Is there a way of avoiding this and treat it as regular COM?

Hugo Vale
www.datastreamcs.com
 
Back
Top