G
Guest
So I have read a few articles on the web discussing Remote Assitance and high
ports. However, most of them relate to using Remote Assistance though
Windows Messanger. I am wondering if anyone could please provide more
insight to what I am seeing?
My company has 5 remote sites; between the main site and the remote sites is
a firewall. We have bidirectionally opened ports 3389 and 135 TCP. We have
also made application and port exceptions to Windows Firewall through Group
Policy. However, when trying to connect to computers at a remote site
through "Offer Remote Assistance" we are unable to. Office Remote Assistance
works within each site, but not across the WAN.
To troubleshoot further, we put a filter on the firewall and found that the
connections were getting blocked because the novice's machine was trying to
reply back on a random high port 91024-65535). Is there a way to stop this
behavior or force the machine to use only ports 3389 and 135?
All machines are running Windows XP and are joined to a domain.
Thanks,
Joe
ports. However, most of them relate to using Remote Assistance though
Windows Messanger. I am wondering if anyone could please provide more
insight to what I am seeing?
My company has 5 remote sites; between the main site and the remote sites is
a firewall. We have bidirectionally opened ports 3389 and 135 TCP. We have
also made application and port exceptions to Windows Firewall through Group
Policy. However, when trying to connect to computers at a remote site
through "Offer Remote Assistance" we are unable to. Office Remote Assistance
works within each site, but not across the WAN.
To troubleshoot further, we put a filter on the firewall and found that the
connections were getting blocked because the novice's machine was trying to
reply back on a random high port 91024-65535). Is there a way to stop this
behavior or force the machine to use only ports 3389 and 135?
All machines are running Windows XP and are joined to a domain.
Thanks,
Joe