D
Dos Equis
I am creating a database which tracks Newspaper subscribers, carriers
and areas delivered. I have 3 tables: Subscriber Data, Carriers &
Areas.
The Carrier table has 3 fields: First Name, Last Name & Carrier ID
The Area table has 4 fields: Area, CarrierID, Homes and Subscribers
(Free paper - we saturate high demographic areas without making
recipients pay)
In the Area table the CarrierID field is a number as in the Carrier
table but shows as a name.
The Subscriber table has many fields but the 2 of concern right now are
Area & Carrier.
I have biult relationships between the three tables with referintial
integrity enforced along with cascade updates.
My problem is when I change an areas carrier, the change is not
reflected in the subscribers table. In the subscriber table the
carrier field is text not numerical and I think this has something to
do with my problem. It has also occured to me that I may not need to
keep the carrier info in the subscriber data table but not sure if that
is correct.
ANY help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Byron
and areas delivered. I have 3 tables: Subscriber Data, Carriers &
Areas.
The Carrier table has 3 fields: First Name, Last Name & Carrier ID
The Area table has 4 fields: Area, CarrierID, Homes and Subscribers
(Free paper - we saturate high demographic areas without making
recipients pay)
In the Area table the CarrierID field is a number as in the Carrier
table but shows as a name.
The Subscriber table has many fields but the 2 of concern right now are
Area & Carrier.
I have biult relationships between the three tables with referintial
integrity enforced along with cascade updates.
My problem is when I change an areas carrier, the change is not
reflected in the subscribers table. In the subscriber table the
carrier field is text not numerical and I think this has something to
do with my problem. It has also occured to me that I may not need to
keep the carrier info in the subscriber data table but not sure if that
is correct.
ANY help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Byron