G
George Newton
I have a desktop system, with myself as the only user.
An install of Norton SystemWorks was interrupted by an
error, resulting in a cessation, and a lack of uninstall.
I deleted the Norton files manually.
However hundreds of entries were placed in the registry.
Running Norton's WinDoctor from the CD failed to recognize
any of it's "own" invalid/unconnected entries. (VCOM next??)
I then resorted to restoring a recent System State, made prior
to the Norton install.
I selected "When restoring...always replace the file..."
However, when searching on the Norton keyword (just as one
example), I found that the registry state had not actually
been restored, since the references to Norton were still
there in the hives.
This prompts two questions for me:
Are there some "Windows" reasons why a complete and authorized
replacement of the System State would be ignored without warning?
I am the only user. I am the administrator and named user who
is automatically logged on at boot.
Is it reasonable (assuming anything's possible) that some security
in the partial Norton install (only registry settings left, AFAIK)
would interfere with the System Stae replacement?
An install of Norton SystemWorks was interrupted by an
error, resulting in a cessation, and a lack of uninstall.
I deleted the Norton files manually.
However hundreds of entries were placed in the registry.
Running Norton's WinDoctor from the CD failed to recognize
any of it's "own" invalid/unconnected entries. (VCOM next??)
I then resorted to restoring a recent System State, made prior
to the Norton install.
I selected "When restoring...always replace the file..."
However, when searching on the Norton keyword (just as one
example), I found that the registry state had not actually
been restored, since the references to Norton were still
there in the hives.
This prompts two questions for me:
Are there some "Windows" reasons why a complete and authorized
replacement of the System State would be ignored without warning?
I am the only user. I am the administrator and named user who
is automatically logged on at boot.
Is it reasonable (assuming anything's possible) that some security
in the partial Norton install (only registry settings left, AFAIK)
would interfere with the System Stae replacement?