V
Vigilante
I'm curious why Vista Ultimate didn't come with its own registry cleanup tools?
None of Microsoft Windows OS has ever come with a Registry Cleaner
Registry Cleaners do not do anything but create issues that will require to just about re-install the OS
Using any Registry Cleaner is very dangerous in the hands of someone that does not know the Registry. You should know what a line in the Registry is before deleting it manually. Deleting anything with an automatic delete from any Reg Cleaner is suicide.
Left over entries in the Registry does not do any harm or do they take up any space. That is a very common misconception. Do not use a Registry Cleaner. You are asking for problems.
I'm curious why Vista Ultimate didn't come with its own registry cleanup tools?
Presumably because registry cleaning tools are unnecessary and
dangerous.
Vigilante said:I'm curious why Vista Ultimate didn't come with its own registry cleanup
tools?
dekruyter said:I'll throw in my 2 cents; or food for thought.
I've used a certain registry cleaner for years, and never had a
problem.
But here's the food for thought; EVERY program you install, and then
some, edit the registry! Good programs; Bad programs.
Now, if I let every stinking program edit my Registry, why wouldn't I
allow a reputable and tested program that's specifically designed to
edit the registry clean it up?
We can't stop installing programs, right? And we have to deal w/ a
"polluted" registry in some manner? well maybe. I guess that's the
question in this thread.
I'll throw in my 2 cents; or food for thought.
I've used a certain registry cleaner for years, and never had a
problem.
But here's the food for thought; EVERY program you install, and then
some, edit the registry! Good programs; Bad programs.
Now, if I let every stinking program edit my Registry, why wouldn't I
allow a reputable and tested program that's specifically designed to
edit the registry clean it up?
Sure. Most registry cleaners work OK most of the time, and problems
*are* rare. The point isn't that they always cause problems, the point
is that they *can* sometimes cause problems.
Moreover, the registry doesn't need to be cleaned. Extra registry
entries don't hurt you. The risk of a registry cleaner hurting you
(deleting an entry you need) isn't necessarily enormous, but it's much
greater than any potential benefit it may have.
Think of it as something like Russian roulette with a revolver with
1,000 chambers. Most of the time you get away with it, but it never
helps you, and if you get that one loaded chamber... For that reason,
I recommend against their use.
Because it's a lot easier for a program to know that it's safe to add
the needed registry entry for a program installation than to know that
a particular entry is no longer needed.
Adam said:So you prefer a cluttered space hogging, system slowing bloated
Registry.
Bruce said:Are you ever going to provide any references to support such
patently absurd allegations? No independent laboratory that I've heard
of has ever provided any evidence, whatsoever, that orphaned registry
entries affect performance. In fact, the only people who make this
claim are the marketing departments of the various companies that sell
this snake oil. Which one do you work for?
Alias said:There are registry cleaners and then there are registry cleaners.
Microsoft's isn't a very good one because it's automatic and doesn't let
you choose what to remove. Are you saying that Microsoft is selling
snake oil because they, too, have a registry cleaner?
Adam Albright said:So you prefer a cluttered space hogging, system slowing bloated
Registry. Got it. Thanks for sharing.
Which is the whole point behind Registry Cleaners. Many applications
even Windows fail tot TOTALLY clean up after themselves when deleted
or settings are changed often leaving unneeded clutter behind. A good
Registry Cleaner run oh once a month or so, keeps your system humming
along.
Glad to educate MVPs daily.![]()