reformat 200 GB FAT32 external usb2 hard drive

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lynn McGuire
  • Start date Start date
L

Lynn McGuire

How does one reformat a 200 GB FAT32 external usb2 hard drive ?

The format utility in Windows XP Pro says that the drive is too big.

The drive came formatted FAT32 from Western Digital.

Thanks,
Lynn McGuire
 
Lynn McGuire said:
How does one reformat a 200 GB FAT32 external usb2 hard drive ?

The format utility in Windows XP Pro says that the drive is too big.

The drive came formatted FAT32 from Western Digital.

Thanks,
Lynn McGuire
Click to expand...

Have a look at Powerquests Partition Magic - I'm not sure off hand if it can
see external USB drives but it would be worth a look to find out - see...
www.Powerquest.com

HTH

Ian
 
Plug it into a Windows 98 machine and reformat it. XP doesn't allow (in
FDISK or FORMAT) Fat32 > 32GB but DOES run with it fine.

Or format NTFS.

Tom
 
[email protected]>,
(e-mail address removed) says...
How does one reformat a 200 GB FAT32 external usb2 hard drive ?

The format utility in Windows XP Pro says that the drive is too big.

The drive came formatted FAT32 from Western Digital.

Thanks,
Lynn McGuire
Click to expand...

Any particular reason that you don't just format it as
NTFS? Or do you need to access the drive using older
Win95/98 machines?
 
Any particular reason that you don't just format it as
NTFS? Or do you need to access the drive using older
Win95/98 machines?
Click to expand...

Just paranoid. I think that FAT32 is more universal but less
efficient than NTFS. I'll probably have to give up and format
it to NTFS one of these days.

Thanks,
Lynn
 
Lynn McGuire said:
Just paranoid. I think that FAT32 is more universal but less
efficient than NTFS. I'll probably have to give up and format
it to NTFS one of these days.

Thanks,
Lynn
Click to expand...

Hi,

I use BootitNG, and just got my drive into a USB2 enclosure, so I posted on
their news server a couple of days ago, and they said that I should be able
to do the partition work and formatting with BING
(http://www.terabyteunlimited.com).

Jim

Again, I'm not associated with BING. Just a user...
 
If you have Symantec/Norton Ghost, use "gdisk32 /cre /pri /for". Haven't tried
it myself.

I don't think you can run disk utilities from a DOS floppy with USB drivers.
Anyone tried?
 
Eric Gisin said:
If you have Symantec/Norton Ghost, use "gdisk32 /cre /pri /for". Haven't tried
it myself.

I don't think you can run disk utilities from a DOS floppy with USB drivers.
Anyone tried?
Click to expand...

I think there's a DOS Firewire solution available....Sony maybe?
 
[email protected]>,
(e-mail address removed) says...
Just paranoid. I think that FAT32 is more universal but less
efficient than NTFS. I'll probably have to give up and format
it to NTFS one of these days.
Click to expand...

Lessee... NTFS is a journaled file system with all sorts
of nifty extras like compression, security, encryption.

FAT32 has none of those, drop the power while it's
writing to a directory cluster and watch it all go to
hell. (I haven't used FAT32 in probably 4 years after
losing a month's worth of work due to it scrambling the
disk.) Plus, you have the 2Gb file limit which causes
problems when you work with large files.

Your choice, but I'd be more paranoid using FAT32 then
NTFS.
 
FAT32 has 4GB file limit, not 2GB.

Toshi1873 said:
[email protected]>,
(e-mail address removed) says...

Lessee... NTFS is a journaled file system with all sorts
of nifty extras like compression, security, encryption.

FAT32 has none of those, drop the power while it's
writing to a directory cluster and watch it all go to
hell. (I haven't used FAT32 in probably 4 years after
losing a month's worth of work due to it scrambling the
disk.) Plus, you have the 2Gb file limit which causes
problems when you work with large files.

Your choice, but I'd be more paranoid using FAT32 then
NTFS.
Click to expand...
 
Toshi1873 said:
(e-mail address removed) says...
Click to expand...
Lessee... NTFS is a journaled file system with all sorts
of nifty extras like compression, security, encryption.
Click to expand...

Which can be a problem if the brown stuff has
hit the fan and the drive has partially died etc.
FAT32 has none of those, drop the power while it's
writing to a directory cluster and watch it all go to hell.
Click to expand...

In practice that doesnt happen much.
(I haven't used FAT32 in probably 4 years after losing
a month's worth of work due to it scrambling the disk.)
Click to expand...

Pretty stupid not having adequate backup.
Plus, you have the 2Gb file limit which causes
problems when you work with large files.
Click to expand...

Sure, thats a significant downside with video files.
Your choice, but I'd be more paranoid using FAT32 then NTFS.
Click to expand...

If you're paranoid, you're best to have adequate backups.
 
What is the point of repeating it then? I offered a Win32 solution because no
one else has.
 
Back
Top