if you do have several users in the same database running
the same routine, that presents a nameing problem with the
make table query. new or temp.
but a make table query i don't think will work with a
recordset. recordsets hold the data in memory. you wanted
to put it in a table. thus the temp table idea.
the user id is an idea. but i would skip the recordset
idea and go with a runSQL for the make table query and use
the user id in the table name. don't know how to do that.
have you consider setting up a front end/back end setup.
if each user had their own local then the conflick problem
is solved and you can get back to the recordset idea/temp
table. multiple user in the same db doing the same thing
is the problem. sticky one too.
-----Original Message-----
Thanks for the pseudo code and the advise. The reason I wanted to create a
new table is that I will have several users online at the same time running
the same routine; filling the same table from the recordset. Having a new
table for each user created when they log on sounded like a way to keep
things separate. It might be better to just add another field and load it
with the user's ID. That way I can sort or query against the existing table
based on their unique records.
Any thoughts on that plan of action?
JMorrell