D
Douglas Laudenschlager
MY QUESTION
If I change RAW to EMF format to spool high resolution digital images from
PhotoShop to a photo printer, in order to take advantage of the print server
and free up my desktop computer, will the output quality of the images
suffer?
BACKGROUND
I understand that Windows basically uses 1 of 2 formats to spool images to a
printer: EMF (the more efficient) or RAW. I see that both the printers we
have installed on various Windows XP Pro computers here are set to RAW by
default. I also understand that EMF gets spooled to a print server for
processing (if there is a print server), while RAW is processed on the
client machine.
SCENARIO
I am setting up a print server for a photographer who prints high-resolution
images to his Epson 2200 that may lock up the client machine for as long as
a half-hour per image. However the print server won't help if RAW images are
still processed entirely on the client. I'm trying to understand what my
options are here!
Thank you!
If I change RAW to EMF format to spool high resolution digital images from
PhotoShop to a photo printer, in order to take advantage of the print server
and free up my desktop computer, will the output quality of the images
suffer?
BACKGROUND
I understand that Windows basically uses 1 of 2 formats to spool images to a
printer: EMF (the more efficient) or RAW. I see that both the printers we
have installed on various Windows XP Pro computers here are set to RAW by
default. I also understand that EMF gets spooled to a print server for
processing (if there is a print server), while RAW is processed on the
client machine.
SCENARIO
I am setting up a print server for a photographer who prints high-resolution
images to his Epson 2200 that may lock up the client machine for as long as
a half-hour per image. However the print server won't help if RAW images are
still processed entirely on the client. I'm trying to understand what my
options are here!
Thank you!